just reading the daily propaganda and found this, thought it was interesting?

Question

http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20070706/pl_bloomberg/atizf6kmwd6g

In this story the representive say if we increase spending buy 180 billion, effectiveness will increase by 31%,

I find that to be rediculous, for 180 billion, you only get a 31% increase in the effectiveness of the system,

These people are are criminals,

when you (as a citizen) get arrested, the cops can tell you your life story once you get to central processing, but cant notify immigration and say hey come pic this guy up when they pic up an illeagle imigrant ????

I dont get it, so to get someone to pick up the fu**ing phone and use it to enforce the law, it costs 180 billion, and even then you end up with a 69% failure ratio how on earth is this acceptable ???

if your company operated on ratios like this you would be out of business in less than 6 months, so how can our dept of national security operate on the same ratios ???

Im not against people that immigrate in the right way for a reasone

Thank you mckenziecalhoun for correcting my math(as i stated in my email to you)
How ever I still find the effect ratio un acceptable at 180 billion of our tax dollors

The old addage of fixing a problem by throwing money at it is well just not financially smart

Answer 1

Your math is wrong.

If they have a 40% effective system and improve it 31%, the result is 52.4%, not just 31%.

If they have an 80% effective system then the system goes up to (and theoretically beyond) 100%.

If you ignore how well they are doing (lot's of room for improvement, of course), then you aren't being just.

You are spreading your own propaganda.

It is only 69% failure rate if they have a 0% effectiveness now.

You'd have to be an idiot to think that, so I can only assume (since you spell well and know the inverse of 31 is 69) that you simply forgot the base level of effectiveness.

Anyone know what their present percent of catch and return is?

Wouldn't it be nice if it wasn't catch & return & catch & return & amnesty & bringinalltherestoftheextendedfamilyaswell?

Edit: Good to meet someone fighting for our country. Thank you for the email, keep speaking up! I agree on the ratio. Time to tighten it up. How about applying some of the laws we already have instead of putting 180 billion more into the hole? I had no idea.

Answer 2

You haven't figured out yet that the government does not need to be efficient. The flow of money to them is endless. They are not based on profit or performance. At this very moment your tax dollars are flowing to the top 1%. The more power they gain the more money they get! Sometimes a person shows up and stands up for the poor and encourages the middle class, but for the most part they figure out ways to keep you in your place and steal your money in any way they can.

Answer 3

man, are you longwinded!!! and paranoid!! get a life, bum!! enough said!!