Should we ban the sun? It gives skin cancer you know.?

Answer 1

Should we ban the star that gives us life?

Sure. Why not? It only keeps the planet warm and helps food to grow.

Answer 2

I think that’s an excellent suggestion for once. Not only does this evil star give us skin cancer but it is also the chief provider of human heartache.

You only need to think of statements like for example “My little SUNshine left me last month” to understand what I mean. But who are we to blame? We have been such easy prey. Throughout the centuries poets and songwriters alike have spun their web of subtle manipulation. Who could possibly have resisted Stevie Wonder’s “You are the sunshine of my life” or Louisiana’s official song “You are the sunshine, my only sunshine”? American psychiatrist and media personality David Viscott once put it ever so slightly less innocently AND health-consciously, claiming that “To love and be loved is to feel the sun from both sides”.

So let’s ban the Sun and do away with all that potentially hurtful stuff. Things can only get better, skin- and heart-wise.

Answer 3

YES. It is my understanding that Hillary Clinton will probably pass a law against the Sun after she gets into office as President of the USA in 2008.

Answer 4

if we banned the sun, well first of all we couldnt bevcause its impossible but without any sun our planet would just drift off into space and either get pulled into another stars orbit or into a black hole and we would all die cause its cold and dark and without light the food chain doesnt work

Answer 5

you can't ban the sun. it's there. you can't move it. not everyone gets skin cancer. you live because of the sun. that was a stupid question.

Answer 6

Sure it does. But sunbathing doesn't give *other people* skin cancer.

I don't think we should ban smoking - but it is different to smoke where other people are, who might not want or like the cigarette smoke potentially giving *them* cancer too.

Answer 7

Liberalism - political philosophy demanding the possibility of picking up a turd by its clean end.

Ban the beach, too - crystalline silica pneumonoconiosis. Ban the ocean, too - drowning. Ban breathing, too - carbon dioxide is an Official Greenhouse gas.

Enviro-whinerism - whatever you have of value, we are against it.
Conservation - somebody else in the future deserves to consume it; and not them, either.
Compassion - an evolutionarily stupid act committed at others' expense.
Dialogue - non-negotiable demands.

Answer 8

Then what are you going to eat?

with no sun there's no photosynthesis, thus no plants, thus no food for the primary consumers animals like zebras, thus no food for other predators, and sooner or later, we'll run of things to eat, and maybe we'll start to eat our own kinds.

Isn't that a sweet idea???

Answer 9

Indeed, everything causes cancer so we should ban everything.

It has also been determined that everything which is born, will someday die. Given this 100% correlation, we should ban all life.

DO IT FOR OUR CHILDREN!!!!

Answer 10

U will die without the sun and the plants too.