2007-07-06 04:20:06 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No because the liberals are a bunch of whining babies. I guess they all have forgotten clintons pardon-a-thon fundraiser at the end of his term.
2007-07-06 04:22:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 8⤋
First of all Al Gore's son has not been convicted of anything yet. If he were I would not expect anyone to pardon him. The reason "liberals" and all other thinking humans are pissed is because Scooter was convicted of a crime. A crime that not only endangered a CIA agent but could have had disastrous effect on our Intelligence community.
For the President to then come back and say that 3 years was too harsh a sentence is completely ridiculous.
Got it!
2007-07-06 04:26:52 · answer #2 · answered by kendall_c_williams 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, liberals would not blame Al Gore for 911 like they did with Bush. If Al Gore have been elected, they might declare the rustic has come jointly. Souls may well be fastened. Spirits may well be healed. Public discourse may well be extra advantageous. Liberals might declare civility and tolerance interior the Age of Gore. of their minds they might have a suited choreographed fantasy international which might dispute human nature. they might swoon on the belief of status on the element of the hill on the same time as reciting poetry with speaking raccoons and ingesting decaffeinated Coke. They know in ordinary terms hate for people who disagree with their Utopian imaginative and prescient of unchecked liberalism. o_O
2016-10-20 01:24:08 · answer #3 · answered by tamayo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Apples and oranges. One does not change another. These are two separate and very different circumstances. In the Scooter Libby case, the president is halping a loyal operative that basically fell on his sword to protect the reputation of the administration. It is the same thing tha Reagan did for the Iran-Contra plotters.
2007-07-06 04:25:30 · answer #4 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. Al Gore's son needs help and sometimes the only way to get help is to sit in the slammer for a while.
Scooter Libby should sit in the slammer as well because he lied to investigators. Period.
2007-07-06 05:06:12 · answer #5 · answered by CpprJnk 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
When giving pardons, commutation sentences the question that one must ask is who will benefit from it? If the answer for Bush was not ME. Then who? Society didn't. You see Nelson Mandela deserved a pardon but please...cronyism is obvious here.
2007-07-06 04:35:58 · answer #6 · answered by Jose R 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore 3 didn't out a CIA operative during war time, so no, I won't shut up about Scooter Libby. Maybe after you people shut up about Clinton.
Never happen.
2007-07-06 04:24:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Al Gore's son doesn't have any dirt on this white house... why would this corrupt white house pardoned him... Fox Noise is calling for you
2007-07-06 04:31:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Is this supposed to be funny? What Libby did was put the lives of people in jeopardy, not to mention our national security. You think having a little pot qualifies as an equal crime? Wake up.
2007-07-06 04:24:06 · answer #9 · answered by ZenWoman 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Libby should of faced a fireing squad in Iraq untill then I wont shut up
2007-07-06 04:22:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Like that would happen in a million years.. besides he is too busy covering up what his twin brats are up to. Think they have never been in trouble.. think again!
2007-07-06 04:44:11 · answer #11 · answered by Debra H 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋