English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When there is no need to (eg Iraq, Afghanistan)

2007-07-06 02:29:52 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

16 answers

Where did you learn your history from, I don't know of any peace loving country that has been invaded by the USA, unless you want to say we invaded England during WWII when we sent so many troops there to help them beat Hitler....You need to get you facts straight Iraq invaded Kuwait and we went to help the Kuwait people, Afghanistan and Iraq were supporting terrorist that did something terrible on 9/11 or have you forgotten that so yes we did go to those countries for a pound of flesh and to free the peace loving people that were being suppressed by leaders like Sudam Hussein...

2007-07-06 02:38:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I did not support the war in Iraq, though to say that it was a peace-loving country is ridiculous. This is a country whose ruling party was involved in a brutal war with Iran, gassed the Kurds, slaughtered Shiite opposition, and invaded Kuwait.

A lot of peace-loving liberals are behind the Bush Administration in the war in Afghanistan. I'm one of them. The Taliban is a violent and repressive entity, an apparatus under which Islamic terrorism is nurtured, and a force for instability in the world. There was a direct interest in removing them from power and there is a direct interest in keeping them from regaining power.

I think that support for our efforts in Afghanistan eroded when Dipshit moved resources away from Afghanistan toward a country that did not attack us and was not harboring Al Qaeda fighters.

2007-07-06 12:09:34 · answer #2 · answered by Pleboid 2 · 0 1

"the us does not invade peace-loving countries"

What about Viet Nam? Nicaragua? What about invading Mexico, Haiti and the DR? What about invading Cuba? What about murdering the presidents of Chile, Guatemala, Iran, Grenada? Which of those countries is not peace loving?

What about threatening isolationist Japan (in the 19th c.) with invasion? What about killing vicepresident Lumumba? What about supporting Pol POt? What about supporting dictators like Caesecu, Trujillo, Pinochet, Somoza, Papa Doc, Baby Doc, Stroessner, the Juntas in Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina, Thailand and Indonesia?

What about toppling the indonesian president and giving the military a list of names to murder? 500 000 killed!!!

Tell me, which of these countries posed a threat to the US. Some of them were terrible to their own people, true. So is America? torturing its black prisoners, murdering its indians. The US denies it people basic healthcare!!!! The US has no right to tell anyone how to conduct bussiness.

STOP STEALING AND INVADING AND ROBBING POOR COUNTRIES.

you want to talk peace loving? when was the last time Iran started a war? Iraq attacked Iran under US orders... killed million people. But Iran, when has it presented a threat? and now US murderers want to bring detruction to them too?

Petty thieves!!!! that's what you are. You have no respect for life and so deserve no respect from us. We hope you fall soon. So that humanity can go on with progress and forget about the murderous sidetrack that was the Pax Americana

2007-07-06 14:51:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ur ******* stupid man we dont invade peace loving countries we invade shitty half *** countrys that cant even defend themselfs:Iraq,afganastan,grenada,ect a whole **** load because it ***** up the flow of money with things like when countries in south america would go communist cia or someone would orginize a coup to bring back the facist goverment so they would get more money because communisim was really bad for american buisness because of the style of communisim i mean im not a communist but **** every coutry that would turn communist that wasnt protected by U.S.S.R. america would take over there gover ment because it meant less money for them the reason all americans hate communists and middle easterns and whatnot is not because they dont agree with what the do they just hate them because they see ****** rambo and **** ****** shootin all the commies so that must mean that there bad. most americans are stupid so they take whatever the goverment spoonfeeds to them that includes movies and the orliley factor and all the stupid right wing propaganada bullshit. anyways my point is that all (most) americans base there opinins on what they see on TV which is basicly controlled by the goverment

2007-07-06 10:19:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

we havent invaded peace loving countries! iraq and afganistan are f_ckers. There people go on like some sort of computer game, GTA killing and bieng nut jobs! just because of their different beleifs... They are lost in there different directions, Iraq and the west will never understand and realise that both of there beliefs are wrong and they are not getting anywhere with them, all they are doing is goin round in circles, and repeating a bad habbit! thats the extremists not muslims, muslims have the right to beleive in wot they want, and hu am i to say its wrong!
but the extremist groups the terrorist jihadie w4nkers, they all deserve to rot... England and America invaded these countries because of oil, thats the bottom line, its the most presious thing on planet earth, without no oil there is no nothing no food no materials no sales no government... oil runs the technology dont it. And iraq has plenty of oil...

I dont think America and england will ever sucseed in killing jihad millitants, its like trying to kill DUST! lol it just keeps spreading... jihad groups wanna take over the world, they beleive they are king

2007-07-06 09:48:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I am liberal, but I question your use of of the word 'peace-loving'.

Iraq was not peaceful it had a small stability, but the government was fascist. I do not agree with the war, but I also do not agree with your use of the word 'peace-loving'.

The Bush Administration went to war with Iraq because they could make a profit out of it.

2007-07-06 09:41:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

it is all bout the resources in those countries, when there is relative peace no invader will succeed in penetrating in to get what they want, so the only way is for them to wage war against these peace loving people using all types terms egg to fight terrorism to get in and get what they want, a kind of giving a bad name to a dog to prosecute it.

2007-07-06 09:42:21 · answer #7 · answered by zainab gangaali 4 · 1 0

Guess your definition of peace-loving and mine are vastly different.

When I think of peace-loving, it ain't Iraq and Afghanistan I think of. Try Canada or Switzerland.

2007-07-06 09:34:08 · answer #8 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 1 1

Because all of our REAL jobs are getting shipped overseas so that Corporate whores can make more money.

So........we have to FEED the few remaining jobs left.

IN DEFENSE.

2007-07-06 09:42:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because we can. Who is going to stop us? The UN... Haaaaaaaaaaa

For real, a question like that don't deserve a worth wide answer

2007-07-06 09:39:34 · answer #10 · answered by Boomrat 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers