Or did he talk about the event straight from his heart?
What does it say about a leader/party that would have to get together a group of people in order to figure out a response to such an event?
2007-07-06 01:37:03 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Anti-Shiraz needs to bone up on history a little bit. Democrats controlled both houses of Congress during Clinton's first two years, passing a huge tax raise and pissing off the country so much that they tossed the Dems out in the next election.
Waco was a travesty from start to end. Every federal agency involved screwed up their part in it, resulting in the deaths of dozens of mostly innocent people.
2007-07-06 01:48:13 · answer #1 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The spin team went into overdrive.
They already had the blame put on David before they storm the place if anything went wrong.
I like to know what a few people out in the middle of nowhere was such a threat they couldn't wait until David came into town and grap him there.
You will tell by the liberals backing up Clinton that their spin machine work well for them.
If someone like Bush did this you bet there would have been protests from coast to coast.
Like I keep saying one set of rules for liberals and another set for conservatives.
2007-07-06 01:43:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
.i've got faith that questions like this one are published just to confirm who gets mad. yet there'll constantly be some man or woman who would not understand from now on constructive and could have faith that this is real . 2 days from now some one will ask why Clinton in my opinion lit the adventure that began the fire. Clinton did no longer enable the youngsters burn from now on than Bush has accomplished most of the flaws that he has been accused of doing
2016-11-08 07:39:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are Republicans still upset about this? So, is some sleazy preacher that is into guns and multiple wives a noble person? Koresch ordered the fire and burned themselves to death when the gig was up, that's all. Koresch was an evil man.
2007-07-06 01:46:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It says that he is a savvy and shrewd politician. They ONLY care about power, gaining more of it, or losing how much they have of it.They are happy to be the puppets of those such as George Soros and the likes of Ayn Rand. As long as they can look down on the people and control.
2007-07-06 01:44:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Every group, business, etc. that has any ability has a group or a person that does PR.
To believe otherwise is pure folly. This event was not about kids getting burned, it may have been an unfortunate result.
There is more to the story, that is the problem. Some one takes a detail and construes it for their own good, just like you have.
2007-07-06 01:42:17 · answer #6 · answered by Bobby J 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Clinton decided to transfer the blame to Janet Reno, claiming he had nothing to do with it (as if Janet Reno was able to divert military hardware into a civilian conflict all by herself).
2007-07-06 01:44:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The blame starts with Janet Reno, ask her for an apology.
2007-07-06 02:05:13 · answer #8 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he enlisted NBC..they had the nerve to broadcast the film of the asault..and you could see the flames coming from the torrents of the tanks..not just one tank either..
the Discovery Channel has a documentary that you can actually hear the children's screams
2007-07-06 01:49:39 · answer #9 · answered by UMD Terps 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I understand where you are coming from, yet to follow in step with the intellectually starved leftist we must rise above the pettiness.
2007-07-06 01:43:17 · answer #10 · answered by Working Stiff 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋