If so, why did Clinton say "Oh God?" Was he responding to the tragedy or something else?
2007-07-06 01:21:53 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
David Koresh and those kids parents are responsible for the deaths of those kids. He could have let them go free at any time during that seige. Bush on the other hand IS responsible for thousands of deaths including our own people.
2007-07-06 01:31:42 · answer #1 · answered by Enigma 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
yeah,I consider people who've replied that we've a regrettable tendency to apply extreme violence . Westhill and gabriella make this element. i do no longer think of it fairly is in ordinary terms a J.Reno element or a Clinton thingalthough I rember with horror how masked and heavily armed adult men stormed a house in Miami to ¨take out¨a screaming little 5 twelve months previous boy who became for sure scared sh...ess! I supported the reality that he ought to be decrease back to his father's custody on account that his mom became lifeless. yet ,easily, all that violence and the creation of a potentialy risky concern(every person wherein loaded firearms are present is risky)became completely pointless? Yeah,it became Reno returned,i think of,yet I even have self belief it fairly is a meditated image of our unwillingness to discover decision ¨non violent¨measures that are too time ingesting. we are too impatient to get issues completed and in going after the ¨undesirable adult men¨ we are a splash too careless approximately harmless sufferers caught up in activities. yet it fairly is an American element,no longer a Clinton element. Bombing harmless Afghanistan villagers who did no longer even know the place ny is or what the WTC became in retaliation for 9 /11 outrage via nevertheless uncaptured terrorists is an occasion which could be laid at Bush's door.
2016-10-20 01:08:19 · answer #2 · answered by teters 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bottom line is the blood of all those who died at Waco is on the hands of David Koresh and the Branch Dividians, not Clinton or even Janet Reno.
It was this psychopath and the fools who believed in the garbage he was spewing who caused this tragedy. could it have been handled better by Reno and the Clinton administration...sure, but the bottom line is it was the Branch Dividians fault.
I blame David Koresh and his group for the Oklahoma City bombing also.
2007-07-06 01:39:57 · answer #3 · answered by Truce 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I'm sure he did say that. He has admitted this was a very low spot in his presidency. He admits it shouldn't have happened. He takes responsibility.
Janet Reno is a peice of crap.
2007-07-06 01:27:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ya know, I'm not a fan of Slick Willie, but why bring something like this up, in such an obviously partisan manner. It's quite clear that you have your opinion about this and I doubt anyone will change your mind, so my question to you is....
Why....?
2007-07-06 01:28:39 · answer #5 · answered by Mark A 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Disgusting human beings who would exploit the deaths of innocent people for the sensationalist titillation of bashing President Clinton.
What small lives you have.
2007-07-06 01:29:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I did'nt know clinton believes in God, Probably jsut a slip of the tongue....no pun intended..
2007-07-06 01:27:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
No, he first orderd up a poll to see how the public felt, so he could decide how he should react to it, then he went and grilled some Arkansas chicken. Hillary poured herself a drink upstairs while sifting through her coverup.
2007-07-06 01:28:46 · answer #8 · answered by polity 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You're taking the quote out of context.
What he actually said was 'Oh God, think of the enormous bong I could light with that!'
2007-07-06 01:28:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Probably something else, like monica coughing while going down on him.
2007-07-06 01:23:44 · answer #10 · answered by Laurisa D 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋