IYO, which film was better?
2007-07-05 23:39:06 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Daredevil
Hulk didn''t seem to haveany real climax to the movie. I felt a bit "flat" and unsatisfied at the end of Hulk.
(Eric Banna did a good job of acting though)
2007-07-05 23:53:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is like choosing between the lesser of two evils, but would have to utimately go with "Daredevil".
Both are developed from comic books, which gives them somewhat of an excuse of implausable story lines, but dang! Just could never buy the Hulk and his "bouncing" to get where he was going, even into the heights of outerspace. I laughed until I cried in the movie theater when I saw this, but don't think that is what Ang Lee was going for, you know? Actors just were not that convincing in the movie either.
As lame as the chemistry was between Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner in "Daredevil" at least they looked good in their outfits.
Guess the same applies to comic books as it does to movies...if you read them, don't see the movie as it will never live up to the book/illustration.
2007-07-06 07:19:11 · answer #2 · answered by bottleblondemama 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Daredevil was much better
2007-07-06 07:54:00 · answer #3 · answered by Lov'n IT! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Daredevil" - Especially if you judge it by the longer director's cut.
2007-07-06 08:57:32 · answer #4 · answered by Film Jedi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
daredevil but even better is da punisher....or spiderman 1 & 2...or xmen 1,2,3.....constantine isnt bad too
2007-07-06 07:06:11 · answer #5 · answered by diksha 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i didn't really appreciate neither of them, but hulk was probably the less worst of the two
2007-07-06 07:09:01 · answer #6 · answered by Victor 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
DD, but I thought both films were vile...
2007-07-06 09:35:39 · answer #7 · answered by tombollocks 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither
2007-07-06 07:18:27 · answer #8 · answered by io 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋