Can you liberals honestly dispute this?

Question

Stay focused (I know that can be hard). 1 topic only....the Iraq war.

Is this not lying hypocracy? It takes years, somertimes decades, to build good intelligence. Remember Willy downsized the C.I.A. and military to "balance the budget". Can you honestly trust Hilliarious? (Not defending Bush, both parties are disfunctional.)

I say get beyond both the Clinton and Bush families. America was never meant to have dynasties. It's time for change.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNgaVtVaiJE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ3Og6ts&mode=related&search=

Answer 1

As far as the war in Iraq goes, in my opinion, we should have finished what we started when we were fighting the original Gulf War. By that point, we were already well aware of Iraq's chemical and biological weapons capacity.

As for the issue of political dynastys, personally I would rather see Joe Schmo in the Oval Office, than any of the current crop of candidates.

Answer 2

Quoting from your own question: "It takes years, sometimes decades. to build good intelligence". OK, let's say it's true. But if you, as a president, had doubts about intelligence, why rush into war? Why not say: "It hasn't been years or decades, so we can't say if intelligence is not a piece of garbage, so let's improve our intelligence and wait until enough time passes"? Do you really believe that it's Clinton's fault that Bush used falsified evidence to go to war? Doesn't the whole "intelligence made a mistake" excuse sound more like "dog ate my homework"? If you believe that it's only CIA's fault, where is the huge investigation of it's activities? Where are the treason charges? Why are those people not being fired in droves for incompetence?
Wake up...

Answer 3

why the pigeonhole?
Proud liberal here disgusted by the current system, and how power shifts between an elite few. Ralph Nader was right when he called Hillary a panderer; nothing that comes out of her mouth is genuine to me. Your question does not actually seem to be about Iraq, though that is a subject I would like to debate with you. Is what not lying hypocrisy?
Lying hypocrisy can only be used in the same sentence with one name, and that is George W. Bush; the apparent moral arbiter of the universe. So don't go attacking Hillary when you have THAT failure running things!

Answer 4

Bill did O.K. bush may have been worst president in history,
i don't think hillary could do any better though. So my answer is yes get rid of both families.
O by the way democrats and republicans both need to get their heads out of their parties butt and look at each issue for what it is and stop listing to soundbites

. From an independent sometimes liberal sometimes conservative.

Answer 5

Iraq was perceived as a bigger threat based upon bad intelligence.
What Americans don't get is that THEY are the aggressors.
THEY invaded a foreign country killing thousands of innocent people.
If you lived in Iran you would be shouting to build the military to protect you from the biggest threat to your lives, America.
America is the dangerous bully, and countries are scrambling to arm themselves against it, just as you would do in their shoes
America has killed thousands more than all the suicide bombers combined
America wants to "fix" the world, and yet they don't understand past Washington

Answer 6

Listen George.....It's all one big lie. Everything! Iran is next and it will start a major world war and depression. The people who are really in charge of this planet have been planning this for 30 years. They have a hidden agenda. The world economy is a house of cards ready to collapes at any moment. They will make it look like total chaos...but believe me when I say they have it all planned out to the tee. I give it about another 4 years. My advice to you is to start saving up plenty of canned food and water. Make sure you have a weapon to protect your food and water. Good luck!

Answer 7

1 topic only - the Iraq war - but let me get in a dig at Bill Clinton and try to spin this into an attack on Hillary.

Candidates should not be judged by the amount of time other family members have spent in office.

If you want to beat Hillary you are going to have to do a lot better than this.

Answer 8

Agreed. The Clintons and Bushes are cut from the same cloth, the cloth of the Illuminati.

Answer 9

i'm a debt collector/repo guy. My parking zone has a great number of repossessed automobiles. i do no longer dispute the reality that the unemployment value is that top. i will inform you approximately some thing this is being grossly ignored however - UNDEREMPLOYMENT. this is huge precise now too.

Answer 10

im not saying your wrong but your a little late on that one. the clintons already have a presidential legacy.

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
the fact that people want another clinton in the white house only proves that masochism is a common trait among liberals.