I'm currently reading Origin of Species and I was wondering...?

Question

When I finish reading this, what texts do you suggest to give me a greater, possibly anthropological perspective on Darwin and the ideas that are presented in this book?

Answer 1

Since you want to continue reading texts regarding the anthropological perspective that expound upon Darwinian concepts, How about:

Evolution by Mark Ridley
and/or
Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges by George C. Williams

Answer 2

It's slightly off the subject but why not try "The Future Eaters" by Tim Flannery,
first published in 1994 by:

Reed Books
Level 9, North Tower
1 - 5 Railway Street
Chatswood NSW 2067
Australia.

Answer 3

I wasn't mindful that he did this. I simply searched an online replica of the guide 2 and simplest determined 2 mentions of spiders, and in neither situation does he say they have been bugs. But we might simply as good factor out that the Bible lists bats as a variety of fowl, and grass-hoppers as four-legged creatures. We might argue "How might God make this mistake?" The fact is that type strategies difference as we get extra proof. In old occasions, it is handy to look why folks would mistakenly suppose that a bat was once a variety of fowl. But even though they endure a few similarities (wings, talons), extra exam indicates that bats are obviously now not similar instantly to aves (birds). They're mammals, and the complete snapshot makes a lot more feel in case you classify them as mammals. Similarly, taxonomists USED to move completely through outer appearances and used to throw spiders in below the class of "bugs". They had exoskeletons, mandibles, and so forth. and different tendencies in natural. So if Darwin was once calling spiders "bugs" (and once more, I cannot uncover this reference) he would were going together with the be given taxonomy on the time. As we found out extra approximately spiders, we learned that classifying them as "bugs" did not make a lot feel for different factors (they've eight legs, they've a 2-side frame, a guide lung, and so forth.). And they have been proven to have natural descent from non-bugs. This occurs in different sciences too. For instance, in contemporary years technology needed to come to the belief that Pluto could not be categorized as a "planet". Science is not approximately constructing dogma; it is approximately discovering the great items and strategies for explaining what we see within the bodily global. And oftentimes once we get extra proof, items ought to be revised in order that they are extra steady.

Answer 4

There is "Evolution" by Stephen Baxter, a science fiction author. This book presents fascinating glimpses of history based upon leading scientific hypotheses. It even extrapolates into near- and far-future scenarios based on current trends (like H. G. Wells did in The Time Machine).

Answer 5

Most of the above suggestions are good. I'd also recommend Steven Jay Gould for a slightly different perspective. His writings tend to be entertaining and easy to understand.

His writings are slightly outdated at this time (he wrote primarily in the 1980s), but he's still worth reading.

Answer 6

Darwin was great but he could not see everything.
I would suggest to complete your readings with the symbiogenesis theory of Lynn Margulis.
And since our evolution look like binded with our interactions with the microscopic world, it would be interesting for you to read new evidences.

Answer 7

The book: Patterns of Culture.

Answer 8

Desmond Morris: The Naked Ape

http://www.amazon.com/Naked-Ape-Zoologists-Study-Animal/dp/0385334303/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-9287859-0527241?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1183718372&sr=8-1

Answer 9

Read his other book: THE DESCENT OF MAN, by Chuck Darwin.

Answer 10

The third Chimpanzee by Diamond