2007-07-05 17:29:38 · 39 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
He has lost my respect due to the immigration deal and the mexican truckers deal, medicare and a few other things, and due to these few mistakes I would not vote for him in a primary ever again. I would have to vote for him in a general election though because with the fact that democrats have decided that they hate this country and want to destroy it, I would never be able to bring myself to vote for a democrat for president. I would have to do some hard thinking though if the democrat were someone like Zel Miller or Joe Lieberman, They do love tis country they just hve some screwed up liberal social views that would need to be addressed. Overall though Bush was a decent President and did some great things, especially with his Supreme Court selections. Just think of how messed up this country would be if Gore would have won in 2000 or Kerry in 2004 and they were nominating new Justices for the highest court in the country. So again in a primary no, but in a general election most likely yes.
2007-07-05 17:57:28 · answer #1 · answered by Wilkow Conservative 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
First, for those Americans who sit quietly by while good folks from other countries offer their opinion on this question...shame on you!
Respectfully, I am offended by anyone offering an opinion of my president that does not live and vote in this country.
When things in Canada, Mexico, or anywhere else are better than in the USA, then you may have a pearch from which to speak. Until then, please myob.
If Regan were running, I would vote for him every day and twice on Sunday.
Bush has fulfilled his primary responsibility...Protect the security of the homeland. I don't care what the rest of the world thinks.
Give me a better option than Kerry or Gore. God help us if those men had been president.
Thanks for asking.
2007-07-05 18:03:26 · answer #2 · answered by Schneiderman 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Probably not. I would have a hard time believing someone's not burned out after 8 years as President. But it all depends on who he was running against. I wouldn't have voted for him in '04 if the democratic party had nominated anyone other than Kerry.
2007-07-05 17:41:50 · answer #3 · answered by DOOM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hell no. We don't ever need a Bush or a Clinton in the White House for at least the next 500 years.
2007-07-05 17:45:48 · answer #4 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sadly someone would actually do it. It makes me want to cry. Hopefully in about 50 years we can look back and see that we had a horrible start of the new millennium but now we are pulling it together. Time will tell I guess.
2007-07-05 17:33:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Not in a billion yrs. He's the only president who don't care about men and women's life who fight in war.
2007-07-05 19:28:07 · answer #6 · answered by rmjjlee8288 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that even Bush is stupid enough to want to run again.
Then again...
2007-07-05 17:45:10 · answer #7 · answered by quepie 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nahh I think i' want the war in Iraq to end in 2008-2012
2007-07-05 17:32:09 · answer #8 · answered by addict for dramatic 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
I didn't vote for him in 2000, I didn't vote for him in 2004 and I am sure as hell not going to vote for him in 2008
2007-07-05 17:33:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
Hahahha--it doesn't matter if you vote for Bush--remember?
2007-07-05 17:37:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋