Sure.
Can we just rename the Republican party, the Fascist War Party already?
I'd rather be with the socialists.
2007-07-05 15:13:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
It kind of hurts your argument that the majority of dem. (and republican) legislators are millionaires. Not much room in true socialist governments for millionaires....and would the party in power vote to give power to the people thereby dissolving the legislative body? Yeah, right. Perhaps you should get hold of a political sociology 101 book and do a little reading on forms of government. (The closest the US has ever been to leaning toward socialism was during the depression when emboldened unions could make demands of business and of federal government. The compromises made by the fed government strengthened the collapsed private sector of the economy by weakening the collective strength of unions. And the war really saved the economy and capitalism as a whole through the massive industrialization necessary to wage battle in a world arena).
2007-07-05 15:27:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Steve S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
surely, George Bush, Dick Cheney, Tom postpone and Newt Gingrich have given socialism a reliable call. those human beings are for great government, in order that it advantages the very wealthy. right here is an occasion. Your an assitant supervisor at a Kroger shop in Keokuk, Iowa making $32,000 a twelve months and pay 20% earnings tax. Mr./Ms. X is a Wall highway financier who makes a million a twelve months. He/she will pay 15% on capital positive aspects He/she strikes the 70' yacht on the Inland Waterway between the two residences in long island and Boca Raton, Florida two times a twelve months. right here is the question, does the Kroger worker or the yacht proprietor pay an more desirable % of their earnings for upkeep of the Intercoastal Waterway? think of roughly it.
2016-11-08 06:58:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the Republicans rename themselves the National Socialist Party, it's a deal (think about it).
2007-07-05 15:46:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Tell you what you call Demo's Socialist. Then I will call Republican's Fascist war mongrels. Both of us aren't to far away from the truth. I think it's time for a 3rd party with a better way to run things..
2007-07-05 15:20:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by usefulidiot230 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
i doubt a single one of you people knows what a socialist is.
like your medical benefits? like your maternity leave? like your 40-hour work week? like your freaking retirement?
thank a socialist. they fought (and DIED) so you ungrateful prats could have something decent in this world, including proper schooling for your children, housing for our military, emergency rooms, and yes, rights in your workplace.
socialism is not, nor has it ever been, what conservatives and unrestrained capitalists have portrayed it to be. i only WISH that today's Democrats were socialists. maybe then we'd see some effective change, because the socialists of yesteryear weren't afraid to be arrested and imprisoned for standing up for their (and your) rights... there's no such thing these days.
2007-07-05 16:42:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Andrew 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes, you are somewhat correct...It should be the Fascist Socialist Dems. I personally applaud your awareness. Somehow those Marxists keep getting elected. Guess the voters want high taxes giving hard earned money to jackoffs.
2007-07-05 15:23:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes, but only if I can keep calling the Republicans the Socialist Christian Nationalist Party.
I know what socialism is, and these days we only get to pick between two artificially flavored versions of it.
2007-07-05 15:20:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by freedom first 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Can we rename the Republican Party, the Communist Republican Party already? That's what they are anyway!?
2007-07-05 15:16:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
They should be called the commies party. The Fair Doctrine Act should prove that.
2007-07-05 15:53:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by larson4boys 4
·
0⤊
1⤋