....You know the chevy Geos?....and be honest!
2007-07-05 14:09:11 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Cars & Transportation ➔ Other - Cars & Transportation
They were good basic transportation. They did not have a lot of power, but they did have surprising interior room. The gas mileage was great.
They did not sell well, because people were more concerned about comfort and power than gas mileage!
2007-07-05 14:37:26 · answer #1 · answered by fire4511 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Since I always see them beat up and neglected with white trash people driving them I assumed they were pieces of crap.
But then I saw the real reason that people trashed them, is because, for some wacky reason people who buy inexpensive cars (like the Yugo) assume their cheap car doesn't need regular maintanence, and the car breaks down over time - just like a $50K BMW will.
Geo/Chevy Metros were built by Suzuki and were actually pretty dang reliable in design.
I would totally buy one - 45mpg is a good thing - a lack of luxury features is another good thing.
2007-07-05 21:17:50 · answer #2 · answered by sakotgrimes 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Great little cars.Easy to drive and keep on the road. Added bonus, at 40mpg more party money.
2007-07-06 01:44:21 · answer #3 · answered by dennis g 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I call mine CeeCee - Clown Car - because I can envision 20 clowns climbing out of it. I love mine.
2007-07-05 21:17:33 · answer #4 · answered by Taffy Saltwater 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Cheap cars are not always good used choices.Don't even try to go in heavy snow
2007-07-06 04:00:57 · answer #5 · answered by Charles C 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
One of the most unsafe cars I've ever seen.
2007-07-05 21:12:19 · answer #6 · answered by Silverstang 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
they are some of the shettieest, crapiest, most unreliable cars you can buy
2007-07-05 21:12:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
They are cool, well manered, and.... Delicate.... But in the end that's what we search.
2007-07-05 21:18:16 · answer #8 · answered by akina 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋