So for Liberals, if the person receiving the pardon is someone who can drop a dime on Cheney or President Bush all bets are off. Have they conveniently forgotten McDougal who spent 18 months in jail rather than testify against the Clintons, thereby erasing the last link to Whitewater. Oh, he pardoned her too. Bubba showed some Great loyalty. Let McDougal rot in jail to protect his a**.
Take a look at this list. Libs are saying it's better to release criminals than Scooter Libby. Give me a break. When Sandy Burglar goes to jail maybe I'll listen. Until then, sh** *** **** **.
2007-07-06 04:00:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Matt 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
It doesn't matter if ANYBODY agrees with his decision, that's the simple point. The President has the legal right to pardon whoever he wants, whenever he wants. Stop crying over something that's not even illegal, oh wait, then you wouldn't have anything to cry about other than the bulls**t your liberal leaders try to pull. Go drink some more kool aid, you're not angry enough yet this fine morning. Go ahead, drink it up while your in your nice warm jammies, in a nicely climate controlled house, driving your save little vehicles while you deny terrorism. Some day, somebody's going to pop the bubble that you've been living in & you're going to be seriously shocked when you realize what the world really is, and realize you've wasted your breath whining about things that are prefectly legal, when you could have been actively doing something to ensure our country's safety. SHAME ON YOU!!
2007-07-06 01:02:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Roland'sMommy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Issa, will get what he is looking for. David Axlerod warned Obama about Issa long before he took the oversight chair. This man is a hunter, He is a digger. He will not stop until he turns all the rocks over. Well what you have just offered here, could very well be the untying of the knot that Obama has the hold on this Nation with. Eric Holder, Barack Obama, And Janet Napolitano, along with specific members of the US Justice Dept. ATF, will all be brought up to the oversight hill for some interesting conversation so to speak. End result, will be Eric Holder Gone, Napolitano resigns, Obama censured, and the sitting directors of some agencys on their way out the door. Obama will wind up in disgrace as he should.
2016-05-19 02:17:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What I find funny is how the libs say that Bush commuted Libby's sentence to keep him from talking because Bush, Cheney and Libby were all involved in outing Plame and that is why Bush did what he did.
Hmmmmm, well lets see. Clinton, in his final hours pardoned almost 140 people, people that were involved in money laundering, bank and securities fraud, drug trafficking, conspiracy to commit murder, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit terrorism etc.
Does this mean that he did this to keep these people from talking?
Something to think about.
2007-07-06 01:49:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by scottdman2003 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Never mind the fact that Libby didn't do any actual harm and never should have been raked over the coals in the fist place----and that Hillary Clinton would be behind bars had she not been married to a seated president.
2007-07-05 18:35:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by EZMZ 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I will never live long enough to fully comprehend the makeup of the democratic/liberal and just how it is they come up with their ideas. And how it is that so many seemingly normal people see nothing wrong with what they say or do. The fact Clinton pardoned these people means absoultly nothing while what Bush did is totally in the wrong. How is this? How is it Clinton can do no wrong? It's scary.
2007-07-05 13:22:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
How bad is it for a two-term president to criticize the former residents?
2007-07-05 16:12:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by cynical 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Do you actually think Bill dislikes Bush if he does that funding raising thing with Bush Sr., at the request of Bush, Jr? You don't think it takes a lot of nerve to criticize our President for commuting one sentence of one person when in the last few weeks of Bill's presidency, he pardoned 140 people? Isn't that calling the kettle black?
2007-07-05 13:15:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
4⤋
Tony Snow showed what an idiot he is again. Clinton gives legitimate criticism of Bush policy and Tony Snow can't do anything but call names. I suppose that's your idea of good government and adult behaviour. Sorry to inform you that Hillary Clinton didn't pardon anyone. And George Bush Sr. Pardoned all those involved with IranContragate because if they weren't pardoned they would have testified against him. Sorry, but the Bush family crime syndicate has created more crimes in and out of office than the entire Clinton presidency and any other presidency for that matter.
2007-07-05 13:17:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
7⤋
Yep we all know this. So what does it mean in the scheme of things? That what Bush did is ok? That it is a good way to deflect from what Bush did? Oh hey do ya know what Nixon did?
2007-07-05 13:19:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by gone 7
·
2⤊
3⤋