We would see death all around us; our nine and ten-year-old parents would die giving birth to us.
We would be children in perpetual mourning and fear for our lives and the lives of those we loved.
As for our behavior, or views, our ability to love, we'd have to decide which to believe:
1. Rousseau (as in "Noble Savages"), or
2. William Golding's children in "Lord of the Flies."
I prefer to believe the former, but with death all about, and no adults to guide us, that tabula rasa wouldn't be so rasa.
.
2007-07-05 13:25:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
enki, this is impossible to answer. Look at it this way: When life expectancy was only 45-50 years, if people had been asked this question, "If lifespan is 100 years, how..." This will probably be answered from the subjective perception of NOW. Like, if I only had ten years I'd cram everything into it, etc. When we evolve, (longer lifespan--shorter seems a bit of flight of fancy--but isn't that the way you mean it?) we adjust, & live as humans, whatever the perimeters.
Edit: Josh's first two sentences express exactly what I mean, however I can't agree with the last part, because it is an assumption. Therein lies a contradiction.
2007-07-08 07:45:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Psychic Cat 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
We will accomplish more and at a fast rate because we know we do not have a longer time than 10 years. However if we all have only 10 years, we will still be kids at 10 years and are we suppose to be talking about love, marriage and sex etc. ? I don't think there will even be a world. 10 years old is the time of puberty for some but not all. We are talking about a normal 10 year old kid; not some genius kid.
2007-07-05 17:50:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ranania 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i might somewhat like to assert "specific, the LDS church will remedy all your issues and you will stay a chuffed powerful existence" yet that purely isn't the case ninety 9.ninety 9% of the time (I purely made that stat up, although this is possibly around there) i'm in basic terms 26 and have been married for just about a 300 and sixty 5 days and a a million/2 so i don't have the main adventure, yet i will supply you my ideas besides and you will use them the way you will like. i think of on your situation the church can act as a magnafying glass. it could make it easier to concentration on what you ought to do and the thank you to end it, yet interior the tip, it somewhat is as much as you and your husband to make issues artwork. while my spouse and that i've got been engaged, we've been informed by a chum that marriage isn't a 50/50 relationship. this is a hundred/a hundred. in the adventure that your husband does not put in his a hundred% then no rely what you do it somewhat is going to be complicated. It truly can nonetheless artwork, many have executed so, yet you will ought to do lots greater. I definitley think of residing the innovations taught in church will help. i don't comprehend how lots or how speedy, although this is going to strengthen your relationship. good success, and God Bless Dane
2016-09-30 23:34:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, we would all be innocents! Do you remember when you were a child? Your best friend was the most important person in your life! We lived totally in the present! We were untouched and fathomless. intense and pure. A time when we could actually love a YoYo , a bicycle, a baseball glove or a performer. Evil was a concept so alien to us we were impervious to it. I loved my pre-ten life. And ten is still young enough to understand dying. The innocents accept the end easier that us old jaded folk.
This is a big, huge topic and a great question....and a great premise for a novel! I want to read it. I think you should ask eight year olds and ten year olds these questions and write it. She is a girl, call her Gandy.
2007-07-10 06:41:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by pat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think it would change at all, just the ratio of time that it takes would change, but if all of our lifespans became 10 years, I should hope that our genetics would change so that we could mature fast enough so that we could reproduce, and repopulate. So actually nothing would really change, except every day we would mature much faster, and everything that we accomplish in life would be the same, simply because that's just the way our life works.
2007-07-05 10:40:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by m d 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
In my life and heart, I live like this already. I live as if every moment is my last, not that I do not value my life..It is the very opposite, I love my life with the intensity and purpose which I feel Creator would want, and in so doing am free and open to all people and experiences.
I do not hold within myself the love that is held by most people, I am more adept at loving than some, and less than some. What I value in my life is nonexistent to our societal views and constraints, their perception is limiting the value of all experiences in life.
Blessings and love
2007-07-06 13:07:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
Most of the other answers here seem to build around the fact that one is aware of what living a long life is like.
When one have only knowledge of and the possibility of a short life, one won't have a view of life. One won't have time for love or all that ****. People will act on instinct the way wild animals do. Living to procreate.
2007-07-05 15:39:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Saffren 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Humans, no matter what will always have the flaws that they don't try fighting! Here itself more than 3/4 of the world is scared of death...I bet this silly fear will just increase if we knew the exact time of our death. People should be able to love without hating but even with only 10 years I'm sure they'll find a way to introduce hatred!
2007-07-06 04:19:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by KT_(Kritty) 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
All else being equal, I would probably start to take things at a more relaxed pace, so time seems longer and more enjoyable. I would no longer try to rush to the "destination" all the time, and instead, I would focus on the journey and the pleasure of simply having an existence that I can be grateful and appreciative for.
2007-07-06 03:52:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by driving_blindly 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It wouldn't change anything. We would just see our life span as 10 years and accept it like we accept 70 or 80 today. One hundred years ago, the life span was 45-50. Everyday would be adjusted in our minds as one less day to live as we see life today. Of course, if it takes 8 years to acquire a doctorate, we would cut it down by a considerable amount of time to achieve it but it wouldn't matter. It would fit the framework of our time consciousness.
If our life span was 200 years old, we would still act the same.
2007-07-05 16:40:23
·
answer #11
·
answered by Richard N 1
·
1⤊
1⤋