I mean transformers has awsome action in it and a ecentric and wide range of connecting to to people with it's story so I mean it has to suck. Underworld evolution brought the viewer through the dark side of the oddities of nature and provided a an intertwined and constructive plot. I mean revenge of the sith had to suck because of that awsome lightsaber fight, I mean id rather [refer the jedi and the sith be more mallow dramatic and have obiwan cheat on anakin as a plot. I mean did you you see the end to eragon were he impaled the guy from jumping off his tail, wasnt that corny I mean it has to suck because it was imaginitive right? LEts face any epic or sci fi or fantasy movie with action absoulutley sucks. Except superman returns I mean there was so much money behind the pay offs of movie critics that it was a great movie. He only through one punch in the entire movie, isnt that awsome, now thats a real action flick.
^attitude of most movie critics.
2007-07-05
09:19:04
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Mrdude
2
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Other - Entertainment
most people dont realise it but they are bought to think a movie is bad most of the time through word of mouth advertising, studies have been done, it has nothing to do with the movie its psychological most of the time (not all). Its impacted through hat people hear most of the time and it adverserly affects their enjoyment of the movie. Competeing films pay off critics who are well aware of this.
2007-07-05
09:22:08 ·
update #1
I find it funny noone sees the sarcasm of my statement
2007-07-05
10:40:02 ·
update #2