without the chicken there would be no egg, withut the egg there would be no chicken ... any idea's?
2007-07-05 05:18:39 · 17 answers · asked by xsacredflamesx 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
The chicken descended from the randy 8' pervert known as, Archaeornithomimus. nm
2007-07-05 05:30:18 · answer #1 · answered by Knick Knox 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
This is a philosophy forum. Why are so many insistent in pursuing an intellictually feeble argument that has some divine entity creating animals from nothing?
Blam! A chicken.
This is anthropologically troubling and offers no opportunity for discussion.
How about this...Wham! An egg? I mean, according to the most ardent conservative, isn't this egg already a full-fledged chicken?
2007-07-05 05:48:25 · answer #2 · answered by el_dormilon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From a religious point of view, the chicken. When God created the world, he just made the first pairs of animals; at which point he said `Be fruitful and multiply.´ Which obviously means, lay an egg before you die to continue the species.
2007-07-05 05:31:22 · answer #3 · answered by Sage of Life 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Genesis 1:20 Then God said, "Let the water teem with an abundance of living creatures, and on the earth let birds fly beneath the the dome of the sky." All creatures were created by God, that includes the Chicken and the Rooster, and they multiplied. In order to gain some insight and understanding read the story of Creation in your Bible, starting with the chapter one of Genesis.
2007-07-05 05:33:00 · answer #4 · answered by pooterilgatto 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither.
What came first was the idea of both.
The chicken and the egg are simply the physical manifestation of "the idea" of them.
And the physical manifestation of them (whether as an egg or chicken) is a reflection and result of the stage or cycle in or of the manifestation of that idea.
Regards,
2007-07-05 06:08:57 · answer #5 · answered by smithgiant 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The chicken. Seriously, if you think about it, the chicken definately came first.
2007-07-05 05:22:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My Dad always said God wouldn't lay an egg.
2007-07-07 19:37:19 · answer #7 · answered by ta 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was neither, it was the 'proto-chicken', which was neither a chicken as we know it nor an egg.
2007-07-05 09:19:29 · answer #8 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God created animals first, so I'm guessing the chicken.
2007-07-05 05:36:56 · answer #9 · answered by SHELLBELL 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the rooster came first then the chicken got pregnant. lol
2007-07-05 05:37:14 · answer #10 · answered by spooky says 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋