Its because the UK has a very lax immigration policy. Now they are regretting it.
2007-07-05 04:52:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋
That figure is a piece of nonsense, this whole 'terrorism' thing has been blown completely out of proportion.
I wonder if whoever made up that number was counting the likes of Tony Blair, and other government members and people in official positions who have helped/are helping the terror campaign against Iraq and other middle eastern countries?
2007-07-05 12:11:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Outsider 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the criteria for being a terrorist suspect are amazingly loose. If someone was genuinely caught conspiring to commit a terrorist act, than this in itself would be an arrestable offense and the offenders would be taken into custody.
There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.
2007-07-05 13:37:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by singlecell_amoeba 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because we haven't got to the point yet where we can expel them without really convincing evidence which would be enough to justify criminal proceedings leading to a conviction. It is -- like so many other sensible courses of action -- against their human rights without going through due process of law. I think that the time is fast approaching for the government to take a robust stand and introduce emergency legislation whereby this problem could be tackled. But have they the guts to do so?
2007-07-05 12:08:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Doethineb 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
god only knews but if you knew how many Chechen terrorist suspects had fled here from Russia and are now living in this country with benefits and houses from the government youd be even sicker. Many of the terrorists killed by security forces in Russia regularly turn up with British passports and one of the terrorists killed in 2002 theater siege had a UK driving licence in his pocket
2007-07-05 14:27:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by vdv_desantnik 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and in the 80' s the c.i.a called these people freedom fighters because they were fighting against the Russian and allowed to come in this country free of charge, why because they help the west bring down the communist and they were called the freedom fighter because they killed so many Russians, and whoo was that yes Bin laden he was recruited by the c.i.a it alright kill the Russian but not the American. what the difference
2007-07-05 13:56:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sid 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they're British. If you "send them back" then they can just carry on doing what they're doing and we can't keep an eye on them. Besides, there's no garuntee there's somewhere to "send them back" to. What if they're a 3rd or 4th generation immigrant - or not even an immigrant at all?
2007-07-05 13:55:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mordent 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is simply because the limp-wristed apologist and bourgeoisie cosmopolitan hate doing the minority-unpopular yet necessary lesser evil which is to rule for the benefit of the native majority.
In other nations- the people would simply take it upon themselves to flush out these cancerous turds with the machete and molotov- see what they do to them in India.
2007-07-05 12:03:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by B.o.B 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Having jobs? Looking for love? Raising families? Finding a cure for cancer?
Just because they are suspected of terrorism doesn't mean they are guilty of it.
2007-07-05 11:56:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by David D 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Cos were a soft touch. What we fail to see is that not all Muslims are terrorists but all terrorists are Muslims.
2007-07-05 13:12:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Never mind suspect terrorists, they have been allowed in for cheap labour, the hierarchy are safe in their ivory towers it is us who are the victims.
They have us all stitched up, if you complain you are branded a racist, if you are attacked you are told you were in the wrong place at the wrong time.
That is G B plc today!
2007-07-05 12:02:21
·
answer #11
·
answered by Equaliser. 3
·
1⤊
3⤋