I think that they would win hands down. You would see the field get small in a hurry on both sides (GOP and DEMS). Not sure why the media has not put any kind of spin on it yet.
2007-07-05 02:46:37 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I don't necessarily believe a Obama/Clinton ticket is the smart choice, I do believe that the concept of the top Democrat as President and the first runner up as VP. That would insure the VP isn't a hand picked lackey based on money to be paid later such as the current administration.
2007-07-05 03:18:59 · answer #1 · answered by gary12850 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully the Democrats have learned that running 2 ultra-liberal candidates does not work. George Bush was very vulnerable in 2004, but both Kerry and Edwards were too left of center to carry some of the close states. The eventual nominee needs to name a moderate running mate like Evan Bayh or Bill Richardson, both of whom reside in states that Bush carried in 2004. I voted for Bush more as a vote against Kerry/Edwards than a vote for Bush/Cheney because both Kerry and Edwards were too liberal for my taste as I am a moderate. Many other people I know are also moderate and that is important if the Democrats are to capture a few "red states" in 2008.
2007-07-05 10:02:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Clinton is unelectable. 52% of registered voters polled said they would not vote for Hillery under any circumstances. The Dems need a viable candidate quick, and Obama is not the answer either.
2007-07-05 09:50:19 · answer #3 · answered by booman17 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would say it means we are in for more of the same crap we already have. Keep the middle-class screwing Dems and Reps out of office. Vote Independent. Both ruling parties are run by lobbyist for corporations.
2007-07-05 09:55:44 · answer #4 · answered by John K 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think you will be surprised at the number who hate Clinton and also expect their senior leaders to have more experience than a couple of years in the senate. I know neither of them will ever see my vote any time soon.
2007-07-05 09:50:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Obama would be a good VP for Clinton.
2007-07-05 10:47:23 · answer #6 · answered by alens01 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
terrible idea! be real - 2 people that want to be top dog can't then decide to be 1 & 2 - they belong to the same party but sure don't think alike -
2007-07-05 09:57:04 · answer #7 · answered by silly questions 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You're joking right? With their two egos, NEITHER is going to settle for anything less than PRESIDENT.
2007-07-05 09:51:09 · answer #8 · answered by go4gin1994 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
they would win hands down
2007-07-05 09:52:00 · answer #9 · answered by Gypsy Gal 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How could 51 million Americans be so dumb..........again?
2007-07-05 10:54:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋