English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

21 at least, because I made a big mistake in getting married at 18.

2007-07-04 22:41:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

25

2007-07-05 05:40:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

50 - 'cause by then we would all know better than to ever get married! (Talk about a lower divorce rate! And all the lawyers out of business?) (Oh, yes - and that's not even mentioning the millions of HAPPY people!)

2007-07-05 05:46:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

At least 30 so the parents will be responsable and not still kids themselves

2007-07-05 05:45:55 · answer #4 · answered by cheri 7 · 0 0

Age 100. That way, if two people decide to make each other suffer, at least it won't last very long.

2007-07-05 05:42:02 · answer #5 · answered by Tut Uncommon 7 · 0 1

It would be never.If I could I would make marriage illegal. Sorry I'm a cynic

2007-07-05 05:40:02 · answer #6 · answered by x 4 · 0 1

I'd make it 25

2007-07-05 05:41:42 · answer #7 · answered by Meeya 7 · 0 0

i'd change it to 60! only then do i think you can fully yourself and your partner!

2007-07-05 05:42:52 · answer #8 · answered by emoboyzrhot 5 · 0 0

40....

2007-07-05 05:39:58 · answer #9 · answered by Itsjustme 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers