Who would you nominate for the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize and why?

Question

example "Bono" "Al Gore" or someone less known

Answer 1

OK , lets see who's the most peaceful guy I'm aware of. Dick Cheney, yeah, that's it! Dick Cheney & George Bush, now there's a couple of peace loving guys! Don't you all agree?

Answer 2

Cindy Sheehan. Wait before you say a thing.I too thought she was a flake a thorn in My President's side. Which we all know she lost her son in The Iraq War and she hated the war. The democrats jumped on the band wagon, to them anti-war, was the same as ant-Bush. Sadly to say when Sheehans Fans found out she was not anti-Bush,they jumped ship and some never even boarded. This woman is a humanitarian and wants the war to stop for the right reason so other mothers do not have to feel her pain. The thing is there r a huge amount of young men and women who have in listed since 9-11, remember there is no draft, they volunteered, so to me the many young men and women who have died in the Iraq war and the many yet to' should be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, because what they R fighting for is Peace all over the world. These R my choice.

Answer 3

I don't believe anyone should accept the Nobel Peace Prize.

One who truly works for peace should have no desire for a prize. One seeks peace because of the principles they stand for.

Think about it. Am I right or wrong?

Would Al Gore or Bono disagree with this?

Answer 4

I would say Rush Limbaugh, but he has already been nominated in fact. It won't happen because when you look @ the history of that award - it has gone to such an animal as Yasser Arafat & the stupid Jimmie Carter (the worst president in history!) So, only the extreme left is viable in this venue. As a matter of history, The Nobel prizes were created out of guilt for Mr Noble's invention - TNT!!

Answer 5

Where have you been hiding all these years?
Do you believe we have peace now? This award is just a decoration, something to deviate our attention to the more pressing vital issues we urgently need to solve now-look around you. More often than not, there is chaos, crime rate is increasing, death by injustice means, death due to land grabbing, endless occupations, taget killings, hunger, -who among the people of the earth could ever claim that they have stopped even an inch of, say for example, land stealing from the occupied territory of Palestine? or, the land stolen from the neighboring country of Syria, Lebanon, etc., or the stolen artifacts of Iraq?
Nobel peace prize is just a big, big shame and those who have been nominated for that award should and must feel the chilling shame!!
Give Peace a chance. Work for it in order to be worthy of it! otherwise, awards are just to pacify, to decorate, to influence with ulterior motives.
I have no one to nominate!!!!!

Answer 6

Bono? Al Gore? I think you have made a mistake, you said the peace prize, did you mean "fool of the century"? You know I surprised you did say Chavez or Ahmadinejad with your warped since of "peace"

Answer 7

The Nobel Peace Prize has become a farce.There is not one person I can think of who deserve it.

Answer 8

it should be withdrawn
but if we have to vote for persons who are flaming wars without reasosns :
i think it must be fifty fifty between Olmert and Bush ,the first one went to a war with Lebanon and lost it and the area was going to flame and the second one went to 2 wars and on his way to the third
so in case he goes to the third war with Iran i suggest he is given the prize alone and takes the honor of flaming the world ,in this case Olmert not take the prize becasue his intention is not flaming the world but only the middle east (so kind of him)

Answer 9

President Bush

Answer 10

Bono, that gobby little shite, foolked by Blair and Bush, dazzled by the political light, then goes off and accepts a Knighthood from a war criminal.