2007-07-04 19:28:54 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
It seems that all losers who voted for Al Gore's father in 2000 are using my post to bash the president. To the uneducated poster who said I can't read maybe you should learn to read the question before answering. Al Gore III is still Al Gore. Al Gore Sr is the father. The son who tried to steal the 2000 US presidentital election is Al Gore Jr. That would make Al Gore III the grandchild. Al Gore Jr is also the environmental terorist who is causing the dths of 2,000 per day due to his global warming hoax. Oh I forgot he also invented the internet.
2007-07-08 11:34:21 · update #1
That was his son. I would not vote for either loser.
2007-07-04 19:31:50 · answer #1 · answered by I'll Be Bahk! 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
His son got arrested. But no, I wouldn't vote for Al Gore anyway.
2007-07-05 02:36:03 · answer #2 · answered by C J 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That was his Son who did that, I didn't vote for Gore in 2000 and I certainly wouldn't vote for him now.
2007-07-05 02:56:04 · answer #3 · answered by MrCool1978 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would never vote for Al Gore, but it was his son that was arrested and not him. It should have nothing to do with him running for office.
2007-07-05 02:34:45 · answer #4 · answered by meathead 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Learn to read. It was his son. Wouldn't it have been nice if nobody had voted for Bush because of his daughters' brushes with the law?
2007-07-05 04:15:35 · answer #5 · answered by EC Expert 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That was his son. I would vote for Al Gore. Let's not forget our current president's children (aka drunk sluts).
2007-07-05 03:30:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, but he shouldn't run again. Al Gore III obviously will not live up to his father or grandfathers standards.
2007-07-05 02:32:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Given that that never happened, maybe. Where do you get your "facts" from? LOL!
And even if he did, look at what we have now. A war-dodging, coke snorting, convicted drunk driver married to a woman who walked on a vehicular homicide charge. What's the point?
2007-07-05 02:49:28 · answer #8 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I doubt he would be allowed to stand for election.
If he is: it depends on the circumstances. Was he framed or is he guilty of intentional possession and reckless driving?
2007-07-05 02:31:56 · answer #9 · answered by Lighthouse 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I wouldn't vote for that jerque knutt for half his misbegotten fortune.
He's laughing at enviro-mental cases all the way to the bank!
2007-07-05 02:38:35 · answer #10 · answered by ideamanbmg 3 · 0⤊ 5⤋