Two 40 year old Frenchmen are caught steeling on the act. One gets fired for such an act but the second one stays just because he's the managers friend. When the 1st French worker claims discrimination to the EEOC they ask him what type of discrimination would you like to file?
* Age, * Disability, * Equal Pay, * National Origin
* Pregnancy, * Race, * Religion, * Retaliation
* Sex, * Sexual Harassment.
Apparently the case didn't fall into any of these category's therefore the case was dismissed as discrimination.
2007-07-04 19:06:24 · 10 answers · asked by JAGP 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
yea, that's discrimination. i'd say do some research. check with the ACLU... they do a lot with cases like that. some discrimination is currently allowed... chances are that would never play in court because they can't prove the reason. the employer could claim the one was a better, more profitable employee than the other. i've been working on a case like this in my law studies.
2007-07-04 19:17:39 · answer #1 · answered by hopey c 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
As gomaynes told you, while it may have been discrimination, it was not ILLEGAL discrimination. In fact, even if the worker was fired for a protected status as listed above, the EEOC would not have jurisdiction if the employer had less than 15 employees in a 75 mile radius.
There are certain criteria that must be met before the EEOC can exercise jurisdiction and they were not met here.
2007-07-04 21:08:41 · answer #2 · answered by hexeliebe 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
those regulations are stable yet i in my opinion ask your self how efficient they're. different regulations exist - like the fee on a highway and individuals ruin them each and every of the time. The greater complicated the regulation, the less clean the technique, the less it will be accompanied. you haven't any doubt seen the object on medical doctors wages (below) besides the undeniable fact that it shows the complexity of the difficulty. If a woman sees a criminal expert, my wager is it ought to get her in difficulty or it ought to backfire. there grow to be a court docket case in Canada against Bell Canada - it took 10 years and a multitude of money to circulate in the process the courts yet Bell grow to be got here across responsible so with a view to pay the contract it laid off a great ingredient of its lady group ...
2016-11-08 04:52:24 · answer #3 · answered by heyder 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on which of them actually came up with the concept, and who is more trustworthy when spoken too by authorities.
He probably planned the whole thing and was therefore fired for it. Being friends with the manager doesn't mean much in court unless favouritism is showed clearly.
2007-07-04 19:16:10 · answer #4 · answered by Puss in Boots 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
All discrimination is not illegal in the United States. If it doesn't fall under one of the protected categories, then it is prefectly legal (although it is morally wrong). What the boss did is not illegal.
2007-07-04 20:23:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That idiot should be in jail for stealing, not at the EEOC filing for "discrimination"/
2007-07-04 19:44:56 · answer #6 · answered by OC 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That doesn't make any sense. "French" is a word that refers to a person from France. If the worker is "a person from France", why, I believe that would make France his National Origin. Your retardedness is making me angry.
2007-07-04 19:11:24 · answer #7 · answered by antiflag3535 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
that was discrimination but didn't fit any of those.
just uz one was a friend and the other is not doesn't make it right to fire one and keep other one
2007-07-04 19:16:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Manager, not owner?
Accessory. That's what you get the manager on.
2007-07-04 19:10:23 · answer #9 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm sorry. " stealing on the act" what does that mean?
2007-07-04 19:11:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋