They said that they would stop business-as-usual when they came to power. They did'nt. Are they that much in awe of the man (President Willliam Clinton)? He did not get us into a crap war. Period.
2007-07-04 17:08:29 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
People will always compare Presidents to other Presidents. Deal with it.
2007-07-04 17:10:36 · answer #1 · answered by wallyshields 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
It's all about deflecting. Trying to make your mistakes look smaller when compared to someone elses. I mean Bush lets Libby off the hook and the Dems want an investagation. So the Repubs point out how many pardons that Clinton gave. A never ending cycle of finger pointing by adults that we elected to run our country. I love um all. Makes for great TV!
2007-07-05 00:14:26 · answer #2 · answered by Skinny 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
When the Libs stop telling us how great Clinton was
and how bad Bush is.
Clinton was a coward, evading the draft so he didn't have
to go to Vietnam, had more investigations into his dealings
than any other President in history. Bush is not going to
be the best President ever, but he will never be the worst
President either.
So until the libs quit telling me how great Clinton was
I will keep comparing everything they say about Bush to
things about Clinton.
2007-07-05 00:20:17 · answer #3 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Never. They have no legitimate excuse for the litany of wrong doing perpetrated by their party leaders. They can only retort "look at Clinton" for every bad thing that any Republican does. They no longer have a moral compass. Money and war are their longitude and latitude. Their is no honesty left among them. They simply parrot what their talk show messiahs spew every hour, of every day.
If you speak to a Republican in California and in Virginia, they will make the same response, verbatim without ever knowing one another. This can only be achieved via a central focal point, their talk show hosts. They refuse to think for themselves. They choose to have one collective will controlled by one collective thought.
2007-07-05 00:17:01 · answer #4 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well, you know you won the argument when Bush supporters say: "Well Clinton did it!" As if that was an excuse.
2 wrongs don't make a right.
2007-07-05 00:14:11 · answer #5 · answered by aisydaisylady 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
About the same time as the liberals stop criticizing Bush while ignoring Clinton's screw-ups.
Never.
For what it's worth, I believe it was the Islamic radicals that got us into this crap war. Period.
2007-07-05 00:13:43 · answer #6 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Clinton is their whipping boy, just the same as Bush is to the Dems.
Not that I'm complaining...
2007-07-05 00:15:35 · answer #7 · answered by fake_cowboy 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Clinton was attacking Iraq in 1998. Period. Plus if he had finished it, maybe we would not be there today.
1st questions if Liberal dictators would stop attacking President Bush for nonsense then everyone would stop pointing out Clinton's shortcomings (screw ups in every reasonable person's mind).
2007-07-05 00:18:45 · answer #8 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Never mind the "when"... I can't get past the "why".... why would they want to compare the two. It only makes Bush look bad every time the compare the two.
2007-07-05 12:00:18 · answer #9 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They won't. Enjoy the con's misery.
At the height of the Monica impeachment, Bill Clinton's approval ratings were more than twice that of W's now.
I for one, have no sympathy for those right-wing cons.
2007-07-05 00:21:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋