2007-07-04 14:16:35 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
cronyism, pure and simple...libby was the fall guy for cheney...there was no activist jury...the prosecutor was a republican appointee, the judge (who said libby's guilt was clearly proven) was a republican appointee, and 2 of the 3 appeals court judges who ruled that libby could not remain out pending appeal were republican appointees
2007-07-04 15:10:51 · answer #1 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It was because Fitzgerald is guilty of prosecutorial misconduct and will become the next Mike Nifong.
Get over it, Plame wasn't covert, there was no "outing", and Joe Wilson is a sleazy lying partisan hack.
2007-07-04 21:37:44 · answer #2 · answered by mountainclass 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I forgive Libby...But it makes no difference on his sentencing. Bush simply reduced his sentence a little...forgiveness was not an issue.
2007-07-04 21:20:12 · answer #3 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush did this to keep Libby silent. As long as Libby knows a full pardon is in the offing, he will keep his mouth shut.
2007-07-04 21:32:08 · answer #4 · answered by planksheer 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He did it because of the slick, oily, sweet nothings that Cheney whispered in his ear. He thinks it is the voice of
Bejeebus.
2007-07-04 21:55:44 · answer #5 · answered by citizenjanecitizenjane2 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Basic cronyism and covering their collective a**es.
2007-07-04 21:23:03 · answer #6 · answered by Slimsmom 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nope based on the fact that he didn't do what he was convicted of.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/07/eveningnews/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/
2007-07-04 21:21:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
what are you saying..this makes no sense at all..
2007-07-04 21:22:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋