I couldnt care less about his $300 haircut.
WHile I am disgusted with his ambulance chasing attorney behaviors--he (semi) earned his money. He didn't inherit it. He didn't marry it.
And if he wants to spend it that way--more power to him.
Besides, he is kinda cute.
2007-07-04 11:49:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, we just can't believe a fruit cake like Edwards is running for the white house. His wife is a loon, and I hope they go away soon. How did they get thier riches, oh yeah, he's a lawyer, and they are bad people. Just what we need, a trial lawyer.This dude is a nutty fruitcake.
From Wikipedia:
In 1985, Edwards tried a case involving medical malpractice during childbirth, representing a five-year-old child born with cerebral palsy whose doctor did not choose to perform an immediate Caesarian delivery when a fetal monitor showed she was in distress. During the trial, it has been argued that Edwards relied more on his verbal skills as a trial lawyer than on actual science, as questions remain about whether or not it was or could be proven scientifically that there is a direct connection between a delay in delivery and brain damage like cerebral palsy. While delivering his summary to the jury, Edwards said, "I have to tell you right now — I didn't plan to talk about this — right now I feel her [Jennifer], I feel her presence...[Jennifer's] inside me and she's talking to you."[14] Edwards won a $6.5 million settlement for his client, but five weeks later, the presiding judge sustained the verdict but overturned the award as being "excessive" and that it appeared "to have been given under the influence of passion and prejudice," adding that in his opinion "the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict." He offered the plaintiffs half of the jury's settlement, but the child's family appealed the case and settled for $4.25 million.[12] Winning this case established the North Carolina precedent of physician and hospital liability for failing to determine if the patient understood risks of a particular procedure.[13]
2007-07-04 18:09:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Angry Elephant 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
What did Bill Clinton pay to fly in some fancy guy to do his hair on the airport tarmack? Somedays it is like connect the dots. Whatever Bill has done we attack candidates for it all. Trouble is any shrink will tell you , point one finger forward point two back. That legendary Clinton , I never had sex with that woman, finger.
Billary's camp needs better material. They fight Bush who is not running and Hillary has acquired foot in mouth disease.
It's funny. A woman's highlights cost over $100 at a regular salon. What does Hill pay? OH we won't see becuz she refuses to reveal tax details. Campaign funds "around" 27 mil? Gimme a break. Two weeks she has... let's see what gets linked.
I like Edwards is not flip flopping and sez hey, I can afford this all by my little self.
Happy 4th. TY
2007-07-04 18:13:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
vanity and self indulgence is bs, don't be a hypocrite neocons, you know damn well every politician spends big money to look good. Most people judge you on looks, be it conscious or not. Why do neocons turn haircuts into a political issue?
2007-07-04 18:07:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by PD 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
A NEOCON??? WHERE??? WHERE???
Someone get my gun, there's a NEOCON loose!!! And a JEALOUS one at that!!!
AAAAARRRRGGGGHHH!!!!!
2007-07-04 18:25:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by wyomugs 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jealous of stupidity?
ROFLAMO
#1, CLINTON PAID $300 FOR A HAIR CUT.
#2, EDWARDS PAID $400.
You need to get your facts straight then come back an see us after the drunken stooper has worn off.
2007-07-04 18:01:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
John Edwards spending $400 on a hair cut is like putting diamonds on doo-doo. I don't give a rats azz how much money he wastes on his hair, he is a loser!
2007-07-04 18:30:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
How do you know john doesn't? Romney sure appears to have quite a head of hair. Hillary's haircuts cost a minimum of $700.
2007-07-04 17:58:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think that it's ridiculous anyone would pay that much just for a nice haircut. Thankfully I'm in the Army and my cuts are free.
2007-07-04 18:07:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The hypocrosy is that he wants us--by raising our taxes--to pay for more "poverty programs" when he get a $10 haircut at the mall or at a barber instead of stylist.
2007-07-04 18:16:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by gman992 3
·
1⤊
1⤋