English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A: "One nation, under God, with liberty and justice for all."

B: "One nation, toward a new world order, with equality and community for all."

I have no opinion on this one, because personally I disagree with reciting the pledge at all. I just want to hear your opinions.

2007-07-04 09:58:36 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

And please state your reasoning as well, if you want a best answer.

:)

2007-07-04 09:59:39 · update #1

Why do you equate not believing in reciting the pledge with being unpatriotic? I believe that as a Christian I should not pledge allegiance to any flag, country, anything other than God. Furthermore, I find it ironic that "under God" was added to a pledge that I believe goes against God in the first place. If that makes me unpatriotic, then unpatriotic I will be.

2007-07-04 11:11:55 · update #2

23 answers

I can see where you are coming from American Imperialism
the New world Order was first mentioned by Nero ,then by Hitler and the same banks and the same people that backed him ,got Papa Bush to project this ,Now his son continues

It will mean a White elite running the world ,with a lower class citizan as microchipped slaves ,the rest of the world will be dead or in labour camps
And this is already happening in some places

The God you speak of represent the illuminati who have had most of this world under control for 6000 years already they invented and promoted him ,

Both Islam and Christianity originated from the same council in Babylon ,as oposing mayor concepts that could be put against each other to produce business and ensure control under the concept of Divide and Rule

why dont you mention that

The families of the people that are with the New World order today originate at that council
they own the banks ,media ,hollywood ,pharmaceuticle industry ,Oil ,you name it ,

At a Bilderberg meeting in Copenhagen in 1998,a famous American statesman said that their agenda demanded a reduction of the world population of 60%.

Most of Europe knows these things ,only the brainwashed Americans are unaware or have been programmed to the contrary,

Either the one God or the New world Order.means the same thing ,it is the same controlling elite

You fail to mention the Vaticans affiliations with the Roundtable UN,thule society and Bilderberg group
you people are the greatest threat to humanity and this planet in general .

And it is distressing how many young people are coming with this question
obviously it has been programmed already in their schooling.

Even to suggest one God means breaking every concept of Demoracy world wide .
All indigenous people will bite the dust as they already have done for centuries

The organised religions have relentless perscueted them because they fell outside the means for control
not belonging to the organised religions ,where they could be programmed
so it was either convert or die
You mention for this to increase
nice guy


The Christians leadership is not the same people as their followers ,Christians fail to notice that .
the same as all

Leaders ,kings ,emperors ,Pharoes,the half gods who ruled over the central and south American indigenous peoples,All of them have not been of the same race as the masses below them ,their loyalty is for other elite their families
Not the mases below

How do you explain that 34 presidents of the USA,and many other world leaders are all genetically connected ,or related to Charles the great and Charlemagne

I supose you call that coincidence

So your leader ship is not the same race as you are ,neither are the elite at the top of the church
all ,all are masons above 30 degrees ,the Masons below that are as unaware as the rest of the masses as to what their leaders got up their sleeves

You have doubts about that
to be a traitor to this planet and to democracy and freedom as well as to the general public

that all he wrote before the bolt of lightning strikes

And you would not be asking this question if you knew who the owners of this program are

Apart from that we got no option
the NWO is winning and has been for a long time
we are screwed anyway

2007-07-04 11:35:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What is worse is a person that has to ask which is worse and is not willing to recite the pledge of allegiance in a country where millions have died fighting for your right to have such an opinion and not be jailed for asking such a question. Try living in N. Korea or China, you think equality and community sounds good but it really means, everyone is equally poor and the community is all you have, because your government takes everything you have. Do you think they have internet in socialist countries? Have you ever heard from anyone living in Cuba on this website? Do you think Fidel Castro will mind if you do not pledge allegiance to his country? You will pledge or you will suffer. Maybe you like East Germany or communist USSR, everyone is equal there, or better yet try living in Yemen then tell me you do not feel like reciting the pledge of allegiance.

2007-07-04 10:22:00 · answer #2 · answered by Curtis 6 · 1 1

One nation, under God, with liberty and justice for all is a better choice as man is just a tamed animal. Human nature will not allow us to become a new world order for the fact that we have greed. Not to say a world order will never happen, but most people would like to think that they are following someone more powerful than themselves not an order of eventual failure.

2007-07-04 10:09:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Your though... I can`t pick A, because anything under god, means a theocratic system that cannot let peoples live free whatsoever unless you redifine the word definition...
As for B, it is not better at all, Communism was trying to bring equality to everybody but instead bring power abuse from a small portion of the population, thus increasing the occurences of social problems. So all in all, if I must choose between the two, I will ask to cancel my choice, as it look too much like our election... Trying to figure out who`s the least worst of them, so to get less troubles... This is all jokes, and can`t stand this world system anymore.

2007-07-04 10:17:36 · answer #4 · answered by Jedi squirrels 5 · 0 1

Your myopic view and limited experience show a childish ignorance. If people dont like what America is all about.......then leave.

The only reason you even understand enough to ask the question, is proof that our country encourages free thought and allows anyone a chance to talk and express their opinion irrespective of their intellectual capacity, such as in your case.

We are one nation under God.................

and we are a republic.....not a democracy

.

We need to forget about color and religion. Our country is in trouble. Americans come in all shapes colors and sizes, but.......we are Americans. This is what should bond us together against the world. Do you really think any other country gives a damn what happens to America? Heck, they are praying for our death. Lets focus on Americans, of all colors.



Listen........this is America and our country should put Americans first in everything. Immigrants should not have any rights here at all, lets take care of our fellow Americans first. America is NOT the lifeboat for the rest of the world. We dont owe anyone a damn thing except to our veterans.

Other countries dont even allow immigration........there is no real reason we need immigrants anymore. Let the people from other countries build up their own country, dont run away and try to hide in America. America was built at a price of blood.......most immigrants today are cowards in their own country, thats why they try to hide here. Americans are willing to die for our country, but the immigrants obviously would rather let someone else do their fighting and sacrifice for them.

There are PLENTY of Americans ready to work for a decent wage. We dont need immigrants. The H1B visa program is a scam by big business, dont believe for a second they cant find any qualified Americans to take a job. This is a serious issue, think about the research centers here that claim they need H1B visas for foreign flunkies to come here and kiss their asses

Its time we took back our country and maybe even changed the form of government we have. We are no longer represented fairly, the representation is for the wealthy and special interests.

The Americans in our country come in all colors and religions. There is no race involved. What IS involved is simple......this is OUR country and we dont want anymore damn immigrants........got it?

People, we built this country and many of us shed blood for our country, we deserve to have a home, secure from foreign invaders. An illegal immigrant is a foreign invader.

America is in a death spiral. We cant carry the weight of every crybaby immigrant that wants into our great country.

We need to put a MORATORIUM on all immigration, until every single American is taken care of first.

AMERICANS FIRST........then..maybe...a few immigrants here and there.

We Americans May be closer than we think..........to that special time...........time to lock and load

2007-07-04 10:23:53 · answer #5 · answered by captainamerica 3 · 1 1

I think both are equally bad. Too many people i the country (who are here perfectly legal and love this country) don't even believe in the christian god. And the second answer sounds like we're trying to take over the world...

2007-07-04 21:03:19 · answer #6 · answered by sicarn 2 · 0 0

True under God was not originally part of it and America is increasingly secular but still as God watches over everything it is in a sense a Nation under God.

2007-07-04 11:30:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A is worse. Not because I don't believe in America...but because we should NOT be one nation under god. It should be one nation, sovereign and independent, with liberty and justice for all.

2007-07-04 10:44:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The original pledge would suit me just fine

I’m not saying this on political grounds but as a Christian. I don’t support any type of “forced” religious inclusion. God made man with open minds, he didn’t make us mindless followers.

2007-07-04 10:05:41 · answer #9 · answered by phule_poet 5 · 5 1

B scares me more.

I don't like "God" being used on anything related to our government, because there are tons of religious nuts that could use this to force their will.

B is worse for me, because it justify us to force our will on the entire world. We should only be concern of our country. It maybe justified to attack a country that threatens us, but to force our beliefs onto others is ethically wrong.

2007-07-04 10:16:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers