I DONT WANT TO HEAR THAT ITS BAD FOR YOU. AND IF YOUR THINKING ABOUT SAYING IT JUST REMEMBER THAT SUGAR CAN CAUSE CANCER TOO. SO SHUT YOUR MOUTH.
2007-07-04 09:49:03 · 7 answers · asked by suburban145 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music ➔ Rock and Pop
What's the difference? They'll both kill you just as fast. Really, though, Reds are stronger than Camel filter. Camel are more smooth than the Marlboros.
2007-07-04 09:52:17 · answer #1 · answered by abizzell4hire 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I smoke Reds, but Mediums only....I'd have to say that Marlboro can be harder than Camel Filters....I've smoked both and really go for the Marlboro over Camel because Camel seems to give me a weird aftertaste....
2007-07-04 16:54:45 · answer #2 · answered by Rmprrmbouncer 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would imagine it is subjective and you would need to decide for yourself, by trying each one. I do know that my step-son who is a drug addict and thinks he is super cool smokes the reds, and my son who is a college student on the dean's list, and only smokes occasionally chooses the Camel Filters lights when he is feeling really up-tight. But I don't know if that is relative to harshness or some other factor.
2007-07-04 16:54:23 · answer #3 · answered by desperatehw 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Camels are by far worse tasting then Reds.
2007-07-04 16:52:20 · answer #4 · answered by Par 4 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Uhh. Cigarettes are cigarettes. The outcome is the same. Where did you get your info about sugar?
2007-07-04 23:38:58 · answer #5 · answered by shmendy429 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
harsh = having an undesirably strong effect
I'd a high potential of for a death sentence is harsh; therefore, both are equally undesirable.
See, no "c-word."
2007-07-04 16:53:30 · answer #6 · answered by Beach Saint 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
how did this question get into music?
2007-07-06 01:50:33 · answer #7 · answered by caligirl8 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋