565 Bush days left : What do you think of a president who wore a radio transceiver under a suite jacket?

Question

During political debates. You have seen the photos.
I think its the only way he would have managed a live televised debate. We have given him such a pass all through his two pResidencies.

FREAK: and now that we know a little more about George W - how popular is he today ?

Answer 1

You really gotta wonder if RePukes ever get tired of having to come up with endless excuses for Bush's endless list of disappointments, embarrassments and failures.

Answer 2

I had a suit jacket that did the same thing in the back until I got it fixed. Does that mean I was wearing a transceiver, too?

They did get it fixed, because you know people were looking for it in the other debates, too.

Answer 3

Hmmmm... now let me see.... If I recall correctly, according to the "libs," GWB was NOT LEGALLY elected President the first time.... sooooooooooooooooo...

Answer 4

That's a reach.... even for libs... I actually don't think that you know what a transceiver is or how one works..... or, in fact, why just a receiver wouldn't do.... And, no, I haven't seen the photos.

Answer 5

Well, from the phraseology of your query that you're watching for men and women to trust you. And someone who does not you're going to most of the time forget about. But, this is my attempt in futility. In case you don't do not forget, just about six years in the past a number of terrorists made up our minds that it could be a well inspiration to assault America on American soil. Thier chief stated that America lacks the need to preserve a lengthy clash and that America shall be sharply divided if a lengthy clash occurs. That will make America handy prey for long run terrorist assaults. The historic "divide and overcome" approach that has been round for hundreds of years. Suz Tzu wrote approximately it, so did Machiavelli. America has 2 offerings, reply to the assaults or allow them to move. If we permit it slide, we seem susceptible and open ourselves to extra assaults. If we reply, we satisfy Osama's prophecy. The handiest means we are not making Osama's assertion actual is that if we keep united. We did not. Half of America misplaced thier will to combat terrorists. They declare mismanagement of the conflict and unhealthy approach. But, how is one meant to combat terrorism? We need to first appear at how terrorists are made. Terrorists aren't made given that America and western civilization is omni-evil. Terrorists are created by way of a 2-fold method. Complete state manipulate of schooling and a militaristic ideology. In just about each core jap country, there's or just lately has been, or totalitarian dictator who, amongst countless different powers, controls the schooling methods. He controls what's taught. He can educate that western civilization is the exceptional Satan incarnate. The formative years develop up believing that we're American devils. It does not subject how high-quality we're to them or to the chief, we (the USA and the leisure of western civ) are the colossal puppies on the earth. They wish to be the colossal puppies. In order to take action, we need to move down. So, the dictators all educate that the USA is the satan. The moment facet is radical Islam. Islam has a doctrine of Jihad, a militaristic means of spreading Islam. Combine the ones 2 developments, a devout zeal watching for anyone to combat, and the state telling them who the enemy is, and its no marvel you get terrorism But, how do you combat that? You cannot do it by way of appeasement, given that they'll now not be appeased till all of us die. You have got to difference the tradition of terrorism. You need to make a unfastened country that used to be earlier beneath a dictatorship and combat off the present terrorists. Yes, a few are nonetheless jopining Al-Qeida's ranks, given that they have got been indoctrinated by way of years of devout and state managed instructing. But the ones ranks will run dry whilst schooling is unfolded. It is a protracted lenthy method. Bush stated so himself. If we opt for to not combat them over there, wherein else are are they going to combat us? They is not going to give up till we die. They don't readily wish us out of the core east. We were not within the mid-east after they attacked us within the first position. They wish to carry us down! Where else are they going to combat us? If we don't combat them over there, they'll assault us on our soil over and over. A victory in Iraq shall be an evolutionary method. It will take many years to rebuild the tradition right into a peaceable, democratic one. It shall be so gradual and delicate that I doubt we will be able to appreciate it. Pain as it can be, however that's the reality. In reaction to the "oil" facet of your query, which I feel is laughable and bogus, the one intent why we're on this for oil is given that the Democrats is not going to allow us to drill in Alaska and stale shore for the oil, we need to get it someplace.

Answer 6

yeah , that must have got him elected twice and a 90% approval rating at the beginning of the war to

Answer 7

You don't know how to spell. It is "suit jacket." A suite is a group of rooms.