The strategy is: Forget the number and concentrate on the remainder.
n / x = k, R13
3n / x = 3k, R39
So how do you get from 3*13 = 39 for a remainder to having a remainder of only 1?
It must be that 39 divided by the divisor gives a remainder of 1. The only divisor shown that works is 19.
(While 39 / 2 also gives a remainder of 1 in the second case, dividing by 2 wouldn't give a remainder of 13 in the original case.)
2007-07-04 09:15:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Steve A 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let n be the number and d the divisor. Then,
n = q * d + 13, where q is the quotient of the division. It follows that
3n = (3q) * d + 39
If d > 39, then the remainder is 39
If d <= 39, then there exists and integer r, 0 <= r <= 38, such that 39 = d + r. So,
3n = (3q) * d + d + r = (3q + 1) d + r. Since 0 <= r < d, it follows the remainder is r = 39 -d.
Conclusion.
r = 39 - d ,if d <= 39.
r = 39 if, d > 39
This same process can be used for numbers other than 13.
2007-07-04 17:09:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Steiner 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
19
Let N be the number and D be the devisor
N = KD + 13
=> 3N = 3KD + 39
Now if we divide this by D then of course 3KD will not give any remainder because it is divisible by D
So the remainder of 3N/D will be the same as the remainder of 39/D (which is 1 (given))
=> 39 = X*D + 1 where X is any number
only 19 fits the criteria (39 = 2*19 + 1)
2007-07-04 16:06:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by amit_hazari 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let:
n be the given number to be divided
x to be the divisor
k to be a constant (whole number)
n/x = k + 13/x
3n/x = 3k + 39/x, 39/x >1
39/x = m + 1/x , where m is a whole number.
39 = mx +1
38 = mx
Therefore, as m is a whole number, x must be either divisible by 2 or 19. SO the answer is 19.
2007-07-04 16:14:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is called modulo arithmetic.
x mod y = 13
3 * x mod y = 1
It is a Boolean Algegra question... And you want to know y, and not x. Interesting...
And it is interesting that he didn't want the answer, but the general solution method to the problem. That is going to require a Boolean solution, as I said... The general case cannot be stated in algebra because there are too many unknowns, but the "mod" operation reduces this to a simultaneous linear equation in two variables. The trick is knowing the "mod" identities.
I don't, sorry...
Ron.
2007-07-04 16:41:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋