In the past five years I have heard almost as much news about Paris (throw in Britney and Lindsay too), as I have heard about the war. Although I do confess, the news about the war keeps my attention, and any news about female celebrities does not. I am more interested in how the fight against the insurgency is being conducted, than when Paris/Britney/Lindsay decide to go out in their cars for a drunken night on the town...How's that for masculine/chauvinist behaviour, s7e7v7e7n7??
2007-07-04 05:55:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by WMD 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe in "Selective Listening". Hence I've heard more about the war and tried my best to ignore Paris Hilton!
2007-07-04 05:07:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by coolcaprice 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I know more about Hilton. Still not sure if the war is because:
1) WMD
2) Saddam helped terrorist
3) To Free the Iraqis from tyranny
4) Oil for GWB
5) No one really knows
2007-07-04 05:54:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lotus Phoenix 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Paris Hilton, most definitely.
2007-07-04 05:07:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anita 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
C'mon dude, it isn't even close. Maybe in the last month or two Paris, but what about the other 4 years and ten months? Let's hope both of them go away soon.
2007-07-04 05:04:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rckets 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
War and woman. Why have these two been paralleled ?
Why the connection? So you want to create a view. And your point is? anger toward women maybe? Or, women are the reason men go to war? Would you please state your point for the record, after all I would not want to assume your point but you did leave a vacuum.
2007-07-04 05:11:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I enjoy humor but c'mon the war is serious
2007-07-04 05:06:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Stephen h 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I heard to much about both of them.
2007-07-04 15:27:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither one, I've heard more about how england can't make it on its own..
2007-07-04 05:10:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by xyz 6
·
0⤊
1⤋