when robert murat was named as a suspect,in the madeleine maccann case?

Question

and in an interview with sky news,when gerry maccann was asked for his thoughts on it he said,we would expect any body to be treated as we would like to be treated, innocent until proven guilty, now there is a connection being made with,that russian guy who done computer work for robert murat, and a work mate of his that resides in close proxcimity,to the maccanns family home in the uk.
then kate maccann says they have taken her, who are they?how did she know there was more than one person involved, and how did gerry know which of the three children kate was referring to, your thoughts please

Answer 1

All I noticed was the contrast between the press treatment of two people who left three mites alone at night while they pursued their own devices, and Mr Murat; who, as far as can be seen, has done nothing that may be seen in a questionable light. Child neglect is against the law.

Answer 2

I dont believe Gerry and Kate think its Murat...I think they possibly set him up for a fall? Because they KNOW what happened that night, them and the rat-pact. How many Fathers, or Mothers, on here would NOT have gone to his house and demanded to know where their Daughter was? I wouldve been banging his door down and all sorts...

Either Gerry knows Murat is innocent, or Murat is in on it with Gerry, or Gerry is just a coward who cant confront anyone. Unless they are Women and small children!

Ive got a gut feeling that Murat isnt involved, but who knows, really? The connection between him, the russian, and the McCanns is odd though! Maybe Murat is "connected" to the McCanns in another way, not to do with Madeleine? Its been widely reported early on (not so much now) that the McCanns were "swingers"....Murat was staying with his girlfriend and HER husband, maybe they were connected because they are ALL Swingers? Including the Russian and his partner (the one from McCanns hometown).

Its all a bit of a tangled web isnt it?

Answer 3

Well the "they" could refer to the supposed group of people that were photographing blond girls on the beach a few days previous to Madeleine's disappearance. The McCanns believed they were being watched, or so they say.

However, when the descriptions of the "beach snappers", along with the CCTV of the 3 adults at the gas station were being cross referenced, they found instead a resemblance to the partner of the "late to dinner witness" Jane Tanner on the CCTV footage.

Jane Tanner was the witness who saw the "man carrying a bundle" although it's been noted by observers that her story has evolved from "a man carrying a bundle" to "a man wearing beige trousers, a dark thick jacket and black classic-style shoes, carrying in a blanket a small blond haired child wearing pink pyjamas". Well, make of that what you will.

Also, by the accounts of staff who helped search on the night, and other guests at the resort, Murat was never there that night.

It's doesn't sit right, that's all I'm saying.

Answer 4

"---...if Robert Murat, who has nothing to gain from such a reconstruction is prepared to take part, why are Kate and Gerry McCann still messing around over this ? whats wrong with these two ?---" Good question... The only possible answer is that ACTION SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS. Murat's actions - He has remained at arm's reach of the police all this time McCanns - avoid the Police investigation at all costs. Actions and in-actions that really speak volumes. EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT " Dougal Rocks " --- .Yes, "...it beggars belief". --Maybe the McFans are doing the same mistake the McCanns did. They took the decision to back them up and now need to save face. The McCanns, having made the stupid mistake to cover up whatever they did on 3rd of May, now have to continue with their lie. This could explain why they don't dare place themselves face to face with the PJ-GNR Detectives. EDIT EDIT EDIT " michael w " -- when you changed your avatar you had already run out of ammunition. You went from having SOME logic and common sense responses to question about the McCanns to what you're doing now... pretending to give 'pjss-taking' answers. So now what you're saying is that the PJ-GNR Detectives and their whole team of forensics are affraid to face the McCanns.... ha ha ha ha ha hah ha ha ha michael w is firing blanks and I shall not bother with your answers or your questions in future ha ha ha ha ha ha EDIT EDIT EDIT Some feel the reconstruction should have been done earlier... Would the McCanns have agreed to take part if it had been done earlier ?! -- You see it does not matter whether they use actors or not. What matters is hat IF IF IF the McCanns are GENUINELY looking for their daughter then they would, WITHOUT HESITATION comply with the authorities and take part without questioning. They know they are inthe wrong. They know they committed a criminal offence by leaving the kids alone. I can't call them anything else but 'fugitives'.

Answer 5

I have wondered about that since it first broke."They" is a very strange thing to say especially as it doesn`t tie in with other witness statements that the whole group left together before finding the child gone.
Someone is lying or the whole group is,whatever it is it is certain there has been a group conspiracy to exonerate the McCanns,
And I still smell a McRat.

Answer 6

The whole thing gets more twisted and beyond belief everyday, you have to start wondering if they are all part of a secret society of some kind.
I know the Mason's have been mentioned but i don't think they would have anything to do with it. its more secret.Whatever it is though i think it also controls the media which would explain there silence.

Answer 7

Very good question. They thought nothing of neglecting their children in the first place. And now they still think nothing of their daughter missing. They know something alright. Time will tell.

Answer 8

my gut feeling is with BB2002 they know what happend to Madeleine this is all a big scam of some sort i wish we could get to the truth behind it all and i cant understand why the press are not delving into it more!!

Answer 9

My thoughts...all planned well in advanced...Madeleine is with someone they know perhaps the Nanny who could not go on holiday with them due to illness? Very well thought out money making scam is what I think. NOTICE<>> I said think not know there is a big difference to those of you that want to start in with me about my thoughts.

Answer 10

I agree with Jack H and Beauty Spot, bb2002 and nmore .....