I doubt Charles was the virgin Prince either. Does it really matter, the poor woman has been dead for 10 years, let her be.
2007-07-03 21:40:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nickynackynoo 6
·
7⤊
0⤋
You are still not the Duchess of Cornwall;the duchess has secretarial staff who would see that all her posts are free of spelling and grammatical errors as well as seeing that their boss would have a special thread of her own,a thread at Yahoo featuring her posts and her posts only.
But the real Duchess of Cornwall has a special site of her own and has no need of Yahoo's.
The real Duchess of Cornwall would make no disparaging public statements about the late Princess of Wales,either.She knows that her own reputation is not sterling.
2007-07-04 14:57:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
She was the peoples Princess and loved more than all the royals put together by the ordinary people of the World. Let her be.
That's not the answer to your question. You did not ask a question! you just made a statement.
2007-07-04 05:13:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by mailliam 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Let's get this right shall we. The UK Royal Family, a dysfunctional family of 'krauts' have been desperate for decades, even centuries, to get some 'English' [British] blood into their feeble blue veins.
The first injection of British blood came from the late Queen Mother, a Scot by name and a Celt by nature, who mimicked everybody and drank what she liked and gambled freely.
The next injection of British blood came from Diana, the sister of an English Earl [Spencer]. Cannot get more English than that, mostly blonds and redheads in the family line.
Diana was simply 'used' by the Royals to get English into the Royal Blood Line. She was simply used as a baby factory and when she had served her purpose, etc.
We cannot blame Diana. She was well known in Royal Circles esp. at Sandringham, where she had spent a lot of her childhood.
How many people out there are aware that Diana was a fully trained up ballet dancer and actually danced professionally with the Royal Ballet at Covent Garden, while she was married to the Prince of Wales? Don't believe me. Then ask Wayne Sleep - he partnered her on stage. She was one hell of a dancer and at 5'11'' elegant.
2007-07-04 04:51:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
di married for love and ended up only getting deceit. why is it always the woman who has to defend their honor. perhaps we should send some of the men to the chopping block. Whats good for the goose is good for the gander oh princess
2007-07-04 04:47:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by brian m 2
·
7⤊
0⤋
1. Who cares?
2. It's not 400 years ago
3. What do French doctors have to do with anything
4. What's your question anyway
5. Who cares?
2007-07-04 04:41:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nightlight 6
·
7⤊
2⤋
Who cares? 10 years she has been gone and they still can't leave her alone!
And what do French Dr.'s have to do with it?
2007-07-05 23:49:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by TheatreFan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who told you that? Did you read it in the National Enquirer or the Star? Must be true, then, Totally reliable newspapers (not!)
2007-07-04 16:19:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by kiwi 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
That may have been a possibility.
BUT without the media, the crap-magazines etc ... would we have cared?
2007-07-04 04:39:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by ll_jenny_ll here AND I'M BAC 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
What does it matter if she was or she wasn't? Leave the poor lass alone, she died so let her memory rest.
2007-07-04 05:35:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Roxy. 6
·
3⤊
1⤋