To judge how Noah would perform in the coming season is not logical, I mean let's give him the benefit of the doubt for pete's sake. But if your basing that assertion during his college performance then yeah but a little bit better.
2007-07-03 21:52:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Darth Revan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Joakim is completely overrated. The only reason he was drafted so high is because he helped win two championships. I don't believe he should have been drafted so high. 12 pts and 8 rebounds a game, and he is drafted 9th overall? That's crazy. He definitely needs to learn to be more aggressive on the offensive side. Also, for being 6'11 I truly believe that he should have pulled down more rebounds. 8 is kind of sub-par for a player of his height. He doesn't seem very athletic to me, as well. Kind of how Dirk Nowitzki is. He could end up being a good player but I see him as more of a Ben Wallace type, but not quite that high caliber of a defender.
2007-07-04 00:21:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by gopckrsjc 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the life of me I can't fathom why they drafted Noah at all. They already have the high-energy, yet lacking in the offense department with their guys Ben Wallace and Tyrus Thomas. Maybe they are planning on trading Big Ben to rid themselves of his contract....
2007-07-04 01:12:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, My opinion Tyson is a lot better then Noah. Next season is going to be his break through year.
2007-07-03 23:17:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
makes sense to me. Joakim is a good player, but I am not sure how the rest of the NBA players are ging to take him--can be giddy at times.
2007-07-03 22:59:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by I don't know 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, Noah is shorter, there is no way that he will get 10+ rebounds per game.
2007-07-03 23:06:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by g mathster 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
it good drafting noah.
2007-07-07 16:42:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
noah is better tho
2007-07-03 23:05:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Henry_Tee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2007-07-03 23:12:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋