all kills count, domestic and iraq
2007-07-03 15:17:24 · 10 answers · asked by crazzy 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
For those at home, here's the score so far:
Bush - 659,000 (Iraq, our troops, and New Orleans)
Clinton - 0
2007-07-03 15:26:00 · answer #1 · answered by ck4829 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
For those with a brain....GW body count...ZERO
He has not killed ANYONE
BTW libbies...we love the way you try and count the murders of the terrorists as kills for GW.
Mentally ranks right up there with the explanations my 7 yr old son gives...only his are MORE thought out....like the TV made him do it....
2007-07-03 15:31:44 · answer #2 · answered by consrgreat 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
actually more military personal died in Clintons first six years than in Bush's even though we were at war.
I don't do body counts on the enemy anymore.
2007-07-03 17:21:48 · answer #3 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He's probably ahead of Saddam and Bin Laden by now.
2007-07-03 15:20:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yeah he is ahead but still way behind LBJ
2007-07-03 15:49:05 · answer #5 · answered by John himself 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
WHATS THE DEMOCRAT/LIBERALS ALLY,THE MUSLIM BODY COUNT,OR IS THAT HITTING BELOW THE BELT LIBERALS?
2007-07-03 15:33:30 · answer #6 · answered by truckman 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
what's bush's rape and sexual harrassment count now? i think he's trailing clinton quite a bit.
2007-07-03 15:23:41 · answer #7 · answered by kujigafy 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
You are woman so I will be polite. You are a dumb ****h.
2007-07-03 19:31:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dude,
What is wrong with your face?!!!!!
2007-07-03 15:44:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
what happens to "Clinotn lied no one died??"
2007-07-03 15:23:50 · answer #10 · answered by Samm 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋