English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

People from both parties (but mainly Republicans) criticized the immigration bill, calling it an "amnesty" bill and lobbying Congress to reject it. Here's my question: Do you have an immgration proposal that could:

1. Address both border security and what to do with illegals currently in the country
2. Satisfy 60 Senators, a majority of the House, and the President

And if not, why is doing nothing (by defeating the immigration bill) preferable?

2007-07-03 14:58:53 · 7 answers · asked by danr89 4 in Politics & Government Politics

Again, folks -- what about illegals already here? There are an estimated 11 million people of which we have no official record.

2007-07-03 15:13:15 · update #1

7 answers

An excellent, well written question.
It's always easier to criticize and generally complain about all of the aledged inequities of a bill which amounts to not much more than plain amnesty. It's not so easy to come up with a solution that meets your criterior.
First off, in my opinion, America is definately complicit in this problem. We have bowed to the greedy, unscroupolous employers who exploit the illegals and generally turned a blind eye to enforcement.
The problem has now become very complex. Deporting 11+million people is out of the realm of reality when we can't even control the immigrants still entering the country illegally, we don't know who or where these people are and many have started families and their off spring are legal U.S. citizens.
I suspect that many people rejected this bill in kind of a knee jerk reaction rather than with a eye on at least trying to solve the concern. Protests and anti-American demonstrations, demanding rights afforded to legal citizens and generally giving the distinct impression that their objectives are anything but becoming American citizens by a minority of them certainly don't help the cause of the law abiding (except their status) hard working illegals who only want to better the living conditions of their families.
In view of the impossibility of deportation across the board - some kind of amnesty is inevitable. Obviously, the gang bangers and illegals with criminal records have to go - and I don't mean "catch and release", I mean back to their own country. The law abiding (again, with the exception of their status) immigrants must be documented. Back taxes are also a bone of contention for those who have worked under the table for a number of years - I personally would like to see the employers held accountable for these taxes because the illegal immigrants certainly couldn't very well pay taxes without incriminating themselves.
Hopefully, our representatives will go back to the drawing board and hash out a viable solution and not act like a spoiled child that was spanked by their constituants.
Obviously, doing nothing is not a valid solution - status quo will slowly but surely exceed our abilities to maintain an acceptable economy - if not bankrupt this country.
My solutions - document these people, initiate a system in which they can eventually earn their legal citizenship in a reassonable amount of time and at a reasonable cost, hold employers who hire undocument workers accountable with laws that have some real teeth in them, deport the criminals, require documentation for any and all public assistance, credit applications, drivers' licenses and other privileges.
It won't be cheap - but it will be a bargain compared to not doing anything.

2007-07-03 15:53:09 · answer #1 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1 0

Legalizing illegals would only encourage more illegal immigration in the future.
We should enforce the existing laws. Illegals should not be able to find jobs or use any government funds (emergency health care, public schools,...). That would remove incentives to come here or to remain in the USA.

The only law that needs to be changed is the one that automatically gives citizenship to a baby born on US soil. Only if at least one parent is legal resident, a baby should be eligible for US citizenship.

2007-07-03 15:26:51 · answer #2 · answered by nosf37 4 · 0 0

1. Secure the border--massive National Guard patrols.

2. Immediately deport the illegals currently in prison (approx 27% of our inmates costing us $40K+/year).

3. Cut off all social programs--if they are not self supporting-they need to go back and let their own govt 'take care' of them.

4. Hefty sanctions for employers hiring undocumented workers.

2007-07-03 15:22:55 · answer #3 · answered by Cherie 6 · 1 0

I take the libertarian attitude to this difficulty. the final public of unlawful extraterrestrial beings come to the rustic out of desperation to look for paintings. i've got faith that a freelance for paintings is a private remember between 2 events. as long because of the fact the difficulty remember of the contract is criminal, then i do no longer see a difficulty. additionally, as long because of the fact the guy appearing the paintings isn't a criminal, and has no longer motive of committing a criminal offense, then I returned I see no injury. it kind of feels like the real difficulty with maximum persons who're indignant by skill of unlawful immigration are those undocumented persons who use public social centers, deliver their toddlers to public colleges, and all the at the same time as do no longer pay their honest share of taxes. to those persons who're indignant, I recommend that we enable those undocumented persons pay taxes, or paying "utilization expenses." this would not be "amnesty" yet in basic terms a fashion by skill of which undocumented persons would not be a drain on the equipment, and could additionally discourage abuse and fraud. the reality is that we at the instant are not likely to deport 12 million unlawful extraterrestrial beings. Do the mathematics in terms of transporting 12 million human beings, and this is regardless of the fee of surely apprehending and processing unlawful extraterrestrial beings. For larger employers who hire unlawful extraterrestrial beings, there must be economic effects for hiring persons without paying suited employment and SS taxes on the rate of no longer hiring criminal citizens and US electorate. besides the undeniable fact that, despite if this is in basic terms a small project between a small employer proprietor or a proprietor of a house, then i think of the libertarian attitude is the healthiest attitude to examining the difficulty of unlawful immigration.

2016-11-08 02:33:17 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Close the border air tight. Fine the people who employ these illegals and if they continue put them in jail. Round up the illegals that are here (citizen's arrests would be OK) and ship them back.

2007-07-03 19:39:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the president already has the authority and funding to start building the wall on the southern border. he can create real border security today if he wanted to.

instead, he sends (mexican-american) border patrol agents to prison for shooting a drug smuggler; and a US attorney allows him to sue the US for $5 million.

we dont need new legislation, we need a new president.

2007-07-03 15:04:16 · answer #6 · answered by kujigafy 5 · 1 0

enforce current laws on the books and increase the border patrol.

2007-07-03 15:09:27 · answer #7 · answered by david w 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers