2007-07-03 14:15:28 · 15 answers · asked by Answernian 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
How?
2007-07-03 16:51:07 · answer #1 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Reagan did no longer want to eliminate Nuclear weapons. sufficient with this revisionism! so a strategies as Bush I is seen, the Soviet Union had collapsed. there grow to be no longer a reason to maintain maximum of nuclear weapons in our ageing arsenal. So, we and Russia agreed to shrink the numbers accurately. yet what Obama has desperate to do is organic folly. He has chosen to shrink the transport systems. this is purely undeniable stupid. That grow to be constantly our ace in the hollow. No President ever did that earlier. in case you remember Clinton in the process the Bosnia militia action used up a huge kind of cruise missiles. those are what's usually a "transport equipment". if so they have been wearing frequently happening warheads yet they could purely as certainly been equipped with nuclear warheads. we've a particular benefit in transport systems or a minimum of we did till Obama. *
2016-11-08 02:30:25 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if every other country on the planet with nuclear capability agrees to tell the truth all the time and get rid of theirs. Having them and using them are 2 way different things. We need to hold onto some. Imagine when the Ayatollah comes out of hiding the day after US and Russia totally disarm. Now what kind of party would that be?
2007-07-04 00:59:22 · answer #3 · answered by Susan L 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You're only safe from nuclear weapons if everyone, not just the US and Russia, disarms. I don't think that is realistic. No way Israel or Pakistan for instance would give theirs up.
2007-07-03 15:16:56 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you don't have nukes and you have other power, Sooner or later, you are going to be the recipient of one. That is how the game is played. You may not like the rules. But those are the rules just the same.
2007-07-03 14:31:18 · answer #5 · answered by Richard F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Would you trust a man that launched a war that will soon have killed a million people all because the people he is the spokesman for want cheap oil? If I was Putin I'd be polishing my missiles!
2007-07-03 14:22:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You're missing the point. It would only take one or two countries launching those terrible weapons of mass destruction to successfully destroy the world and everyone in it.........
2007-07-03 14:33:18 · answer #7 · answered by pootfart3 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, even Robert McNamara admitted that you would never need more than 100 for deterrance.
2007-07-03 14:24:33 · answer #8 · answered by Zelda Hunter 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well yes,they should respect the NNPT and completely disarm..But one step at the time...
2007-07-03 18:47:04 · answer #9 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Or we could just give them to North Korea and Iran.
2007-07-03 14:21:49 · answer #10 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yeah. Iran should be the only country with nukes.
2007-07-03 14:19:15 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋