After we finish liberating Iraq are we going to move to Tibet?

Question

After Iraq wouldn't the next logical step be "Operation:Tibetan freedom" AKA WWIII?

I mean you can not just pick to liberate one country and leave all the rest out, the Tibetan people have been waiting for almost 50 years (in 2009). Then after that there are probably some more countries that need liberating, some African countries with corupt goverments and genocide, I belive Ghana still has slavery, and there are even more places....

So where are we going next?

Answer 1

That is where the commonline used by neo-conservatives failed. "Is our moral duty to liberate others", what about the Ethiopian government opressing its own people? What about Tibet or Darfur? Why should only Iraq be singled out for liberation? If we truly want to take up roles as protectors and liberators then we should do that to every country who needs it. Otherwise, we are just war mongerers and the logical thing to do is stay out of international affairs.

Answer 2

Where are we going next?

Canada.

A preemptive strike would completely take them by surprise and probably wipe out the Mounties before they had a chance to mobilize and carry out a massive offensive led by famed military leader, Dudley Dooright.

The "wood for food" program would all but wipe out our current record deficit, and give us ample resources to make all the smores we could ever want.

We have to cripple Canada before it's too late.

Answer 3

Let's try it again. Tibet hasn't attacked us or our allies.

Iraq attacked Kuwait (ally);
Iraq paid suicide bombers to attack Israel (ally);
Iraq attacked our troops repeatedly over the no-fly zone during the ten-year cease fire.

Iraq has called for our destruction repeatedly.

I think the other countries you mention have a long way to go before we have the right to ignore their sovereignty.

Answer 4

Thanks to clinton giving the chinese missile technology we'll have to wait to free tibet.. We can't go up against china yet since we can't rely on most of our so called allies.

I think Dafur will be next. Then maybe Zimbabwe.

Our mission of spreading freedom and democracy throughout the world will take time.

Answer 5

Iraq = oil
Tibet = no oil

this mean no "liberating" of Tibet

Answer 6

Anybody from Darfur, Ghana, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Tibet, etc...will continue to be oppressed, suffer, and die because there is no oil to be had there.

Answer 7

Are ther any any oil fields in Tibet?

Answer 8

Heck no. That's where DNC received a good deal of their funding in the Clinton era.

Answer 9

We should liberate mexico from their corrupt goverment so they wouldn't have to leave it by the millions

Answer 10

theres no oil in tibet why would we go there?