Our long political nightmare is almost over.
2007-07-06 05:45:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's hard to tell whether George Bush is being manipulated by other people in the gov. You can't really have an objective view until years later. Would people be upset if we weren't helping Iraq. It seems that no matter what happens, the president get all of the blame. I mean, how many presidents were popular during their era, but are now considered with great criticism, and vice versa? Like Calvin Coolidge of Herbert Hoover? It will be interesting to see if people's views of George W. Bush change in the future. And whoever says that Clinton, Obama don't have a chance, who do you think it'll be? A republican? yeah right!
2007-07-03 13:45:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
might not be great for people trying to recruit terrorists. Bush has been REALLY REALLY great at that.
Patriotic man interesting arguement that you make here i copied it to paste "Go go ahead you liberal dolts and simpletons, wait for 2009, you'll still be the losers you are today and still w/o a plan and with no real lasting solutions of your own. You can't win in the arena of ideas, so you resort to name calling. Sound and fury signifying nothing. "
Do you see anything in there? Like you yourself starting in with the name calling? How is this for an arguement against liking bush's presidency. He is part of the group that is selling our country down the river to the Global Corporate Banking industry. His actions have harmed the America i was taught to love and protect. I am far from a liberal, i wouldnt vote for hillary, obama, kerry or any other liberal Dem. Nor however would i vote for most Republicans. Please explain to me how allowing our country to be fleeced by the Federal Reserve Bank and allowing CHINA to own 1/3rd of our countries debt is something ANY American President should allow to continue?
2007-07-03 13:57:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yet another presidential campaign where the voters vote more against a candidate than for a candidate. And in this next campaign, I think more people will be voting against a party than for any of the candidates. It will be interesting to see the percentage who vote independent or some party other than the Big Two. If anything Baby Bush accomplished it is the harm to the party.
2007-07-03 13:46:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by XPig 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
Happy Independence to you too!! In case you haven't noticed, this man was voted into office by the majority of his followers. If you don't like the way things are being done, then get out there and "try" to fix whatever it is you think is wrong. We are a country that continues to fight for our freedom, refusing to let anyone take it away and refuses to let others put fear in us that our safety is at risk. You're forgetting that nobody liked Reagan as well. We are the country that everyone runs to when their country is in danger/trouble---hence the phrase "The melting pot". We are going to continue to help other countries that have the fire in their bellies to be free like us. Because if we don't help them , who will?
Sounds like you're getting a little too comfortable in your own
britches here in this country...why don't you go ask someone from 1930 what it was like to come to this country & how they were treated. I would gaurante that if you asked an Irishman, he would tell you that he was treated like some African Americans are still treated today.
I suggest you sit back and ask yourself why you are here in the U.S.A. If you can find a better place here on this Earth, then by all means go ahead and share with the rest of the class.
May some God (most likley not mine) help your soul, if you have one! We all want nothing more than to raise a family and to see them in a better world than what was left to us.
2007-07-03 14:04:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by mickie 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
You libs really crack me up. Your ignorance is so amusing. I have my issues with W but he's still a better alternative than any of the other monkeys you trolls trot out onto the scene.
Besides which W is not a REAL conservative and if you don't know that the bush's and clintonistas are in cahoots, your IQ is a lot less than 91.
We need real dignity and patriotism back in america and in pwer and that NEVER comes from the left commies. And for all you libs endless whining and bantering on about 2009, 2009 BS, you still don't have any REAl plan or solutions of your own. All you know is blame bush, blame bush, never any accountability or maturity from your side.
You sound like the whiney children that you are, that stomp their feet when you don't get your way. and when confronted with why you dislike him, you rant on about war for oil and murdering and all this other nonsensical garbage that is nowhere to be found in reality.
Go go ahead you liberal dolts and simpletons, wait for 2009, you'll still be the losers you are today and still w/o a plan and with no real lasting solutions of your own. You can't win in the arena of ideas, so you resort to name calling. Sound and fury signifying nothing.
So go and prostelytize all you want with your obnoxious bumper stickers about Hillary and Osama for 2008, just don't be surprised when you lose. if your way is so much better, how come things haven't improved under your "plan" since the 1960's? Minorities and union "workers" are still complaining about the same exact things they were nearly fifty years ago, so if your way works so well, why do your problems still exist? Because you like to keep people down so you can run our lives and tell us how to do things, because you're control freaks and you are so condascending that you think you know better than all of us how to go about our business and I'm so sick and tired of you ****^&*& lieberals and your smug, arrogant and elitist ways!!!
Go away libs 2008 and beyond!!!
Hey Phil, since you lieberals like to copy and paste so much, what conspiracy theory kook did you pick up your information?
You know Bush is doing no such thing with banking fraud and you're really reaching if this is your main argument against him.
If you bothered to read my entire statement, you would have noticed that I said I have some problems with his amnesty bill hostile takeover, his wasteful liberal spending on education in all the wrong places within our country and that he's too friendly with Clinton and that there's something going on there that's not good for us as americans, but then that would take objectivity on your part and due diligence, now wouldn't it?
2007-07-03 14:00:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Patriotic Man 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
Dissolved, no. Have to compete with a much larger group of political parties, yes.
Neocons may have managed something no one has been able to do in nearly 2 centuries... bring about the eventual destruction of the two party system in the US.
2007-07-03 13:39:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
I agree, so do 25000 wounded Americans and their families. He has done enough to America for the next 100 yrs.
2007-07-03 13:56:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by margie s 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't think the Republicans are so stupid that they will continue to allow the neocons to continue to dominate their party.
2007-07-03 14:17:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
George Bush is Jesus
2007-07-03 13:45:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by coolkid1231 1
·
2⤊
1⤋