English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just like in the past, the terrorist bombers that were caught in England are male lslamic fascists.

2007-07-03 12:29:19 · 20 answers · asked by a bush family member 7 in Politics & Government Politics

Lib Dims think Islamic facists should never be searched before boarding a plane, but there should be automatic strip searching of non-Islamic 89 year old grandmothers.

2007-07-03 13:18:59 · update #1

20 answers

Liberals are missing that key part of the brain that kicks in and tells the rest of us not to be stupid.

2007-07-11 02:14:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Here's some other things that work in fighting crime:

- mass roundups
- torture
- public executions
- killing and burning entire villages to punish suspects from that village
- spy cameras in every home
- putting all members of a suspected group in concentration camps

You like those ideas too?

Just because something works doesn't make it right. And it doesn't make it effective in the long run. If we claim to be defending our values and our freedom, we can't give them up to defend them.

Besides, how did profiling help this case? All it would have done is make every single Muslim male a suspect - hardly narrows it down. And it would also take non-Muslim males out of the picture - but what if the suspects were not Muslim males? What if they were posing as something else? Or they were from some other terror group, like the IRA or something?

2007-07-03 12:36:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

So you would have law enforcement pull over every Middle-Eastern looking man in America on the highways to fight crime? Society would come to a halt. There would be national outrage. It's not that simple.

2007-07-08 15:58:10 · answer #3 · answered by MICHAEL B 3 · 1 0

Yes, profiling has scientific and logical roots and it has to be used to fight crime. We as a free society has to be very careful how to use profiling. Enforcers must be specially trained so not to get carried away and provoke or insult people unnecessarily.

2007-07-09 06:22:43 · answer #4 · answered by johnfarber2000 6 · 0 0

Please produce some references or evidence indicating that the Liberals are against profiling.

Profiling is probably a good idea but it may be worth noting the case of Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold. Ordinary goth kids, killed a whole bunch of people at Columbine. Not profiled.

2007-07-08 00:52:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Terrorists aren’t stupid. Whatever group you target for profiling, they’ll find someone who doesn’t meet the profile to carry out the terrorist attack. If you’re not looking at everyone then you will miss the most dangerous.

2007-07-10 10:27:39 · answer #6 · answered by relevant inquiry 6 · 0 1

You do realize that those "Islamic Fascist" were also Doctors....so should we start profiling all physicians who travel overseas for all purposes? YOU are a racist and a very sad excuse for a human being. But you already knew that, didn't you!

2007-07-10 06:42:04 · answer #7 · answered by Becca Porter 1 · 1 1

Where did you come up with this? I know these points on this site are like monopoly money but was it really worth the 5? This bickering between the parties gets more and more ridiculous everdyday.

2007-07-11 02:01:16 · answer #8 · answered by Big Paesano 4 · 0 1

And come to think of it, most serial killers are white males. I suppose they should start profiling white men too.

But then again, there is was that whole IRA thing. And that whole skinhead McVeigh thing.

Gosh, maybe profiling is just an excuse people give - using selective data in order to justify their prejudices.

2007-07-03 12:32:07 · answer #9 · answered by Steve 6 · 5 1

profile Republicans

2007-07-03 12:32:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers