Should feminists be naked as clothes are social constructs?

Question

Isn't it about time you ladies rejected cultural expectations and removed these symbols of oppression?

I say yes.

formerly known as, yes I can get much more ridiculous.

How many other species of animals wear clothes? It's unnatural.

formerly: that's exactly my point. I'm not genuinely arguing for nudism, I'm saying that just because something is socially constructed doesn't automatically make it bad.

Example: women tend to grow their hair long, and men tend to keep it short. There's no harm in that, so long as we understand that it's a social construct and don't vilify those that go against it.

Answer 1

Thank you for that fine attack on that pernicious doctrine; " social constructionism ".

Answer 2

For one ingredient sexuality is rushes of blood and erections mutually as gender is behaviours, customs and how human beings flow their physique. Gender is extra social and much less actual. Few feminists think of they'd think of a beard onto their face yet do think of that they'd artwork or take part in aggressive activities i.e. a divide between the social and actual. This seems to be vindicated via the reality that gay adult men can exhibit the two behaviours, customs or physique strikes as camp or directly performing in spite of the goings on of their pants. yet another ingredient is the reality that homosexuality is so widely used(even repressive countries like Iran) which working women folk,and abode being concerned ones are no longer and are not even homogeneous. Edit. regardless of with regard to the potential actual impacts of concepts on gender the element i became into making is that an erection is a unique reaction to a stimulus mutually as customs, roles and physique language are a mesh of responses: they're a kit of characteristics. some which for sure do no longer upload up. as an occasion women folk are meant to be communicators it is significant in activities that prefer co-op activities and politics. yet their is paucity of participation in the two. Co-op activities in itself is a kit of characteristics, its no longer basically being aggressive, yet co-operative and communicative. So regardless of in case you will desire to assert that aggression(like sexuality) became into biologically desperate you actual could no longer say that gender roles/gender or interest as an entire have been. Theres certainly a clean decrease qualitative bounce there.

Answer 3

Agreed, social constructs are not necessarily bad; the other side of this is that they also are not necessarily ethically acceptable. Careful! It is fashion that is socially constructed, not the actual clothing items. By saying clothes instead of fashion, you are equivocating between mere social creations and social constructs. Let me explain.

An example of a social construct is 'race.' It would be absurd to say that we should get rid of all the races because the concept 'race' is socially constructed? We should perhaps get rid of the concept 'race,' but that doesn't mean that we should eliminate all the people who fall under any of the racial categories. Race is a social construct because it is a socially contingent and arbitrary concept. It is arbitrary to measure what combinations of physical features fall under the various categories of "race"; say, place features that have a certain colour and certain shape in racial category A, and features that have other certain colours and shapes in racial category B. "Race" is evidently arbitrary when one sees that there many persons who are mixed in various ways, and asks how to racialize those ones.

By contrast clothes are not social constructs in the theoretical sense; clothes are cultural artefacts with various meanings attached to them (for example, individual expression, fashion, preference, class, age, gender and so forth). There is nothing arbitrary about clothes themselves. How we assign clothes to various categories of fashion and style does involve some arbitrariness, but not the actual clothing items. It is the fashion categories that are the social constructs, not the actual clothing items. We know where our clothes begin and where they end, and thus we can easily remove them, for example, to take a shower.

In light of what I have said above, your question could be reworded, We shouldn't accept fashion because it is socially constructed? Why not? Fashion is good in that it is a way for individuals to express themselves, and to celebrate special occasions, for example. It is bad in that some persons can afford more than others the expensive fashions, and thus high fashion is socially exclusive. What we should do is make it more affordable for everyone to be fashionable.

A lot of things are social constructs. No one ever says that we need to reject all social constructs: not social constructivists and not feminists. By the way, not all feminists are social constructivists. There are some social constructivist feminists. Your question draws a straw person argument, that is, a type of fallacious argument, against feminism when it portrays feminists as if they pursue the elimination of social constructs altogether. What social constructivist feminists warn is that we need to be aware of how the social constructs that we hold adversely influence our behaviour towards others.

Answer 4

Clothes arnt just "cultural expectation." People wear clothes to also express who they are. You can really tell how a person is just by looking at their clothes. Yeh, Im not saying it would be cool if we could walk around topless like GUYS do but I think your just saying this because you want to say that just to hear what we think about this. But, yeh, I guess at some angle I know where you could be coming from.

Answer 5

LOL, yeah that would be fun. I tend to sunburn easily, however. Plus, the folks in Canada might get a little chilly at times.....

Answer 6

Oh, give it a rest. We like wearing clothes. We just don't like being told that we should wear certain kinds of clothes.

Answer 7

You first.

Answer 8

Yes, if it ever comes down to that.

Answer 9

Then make sure that they all have a pure white steed they can ride down main street. It's the least you can do.

Answer 10

clothes aren't cultural "expectations" they're protection from the the enviornment.

can you get more ridiculous?

Answer 11

well as long as u no longer require social fabric X-)