I think this could be dangerous.
2007-07-03 09:39:28 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
by delivering babies I mean having their own babies.
2007-07-03 09:40:02 · update #1
umm........ yea.
2007-07-03 09:42:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
12 year olds bodies aren't fully developed(unless their that one rare medical mystery like the 5 year old who gave birth to a baby and was perfectly fine in like the 1930s) So many things can go wrong during the pregnancy the birth and post birth.
First their body's most of the time wont be able to carry a baby full term so it will be premature a lot of the time. The babies can have low birth weight and not to mention the emotional and physical harm it can do to the mother of the baby. Physically she can die from the stress of child birth because of how young she is, plus many more complications that can arise.Mentally a 12 year old isn't stable enough to handle the mood swings and hormones going through her body during pregnancy she could make many foolish choices while and even after shes pregnant because now she has a child and most likely has no idea what to do with it.
I'm 13 myself and I can't imagine a girl my age or even the girls that are 16 and 17 having kids, they're in school still and need to focus on being kids not having them, let alone the little 6th graders and incoming 7th graders having them.
2007-07-03 16:53:20 · answer #2 · answered by PerfectLoser94 2 · 6⤊ 0⤋
With bodies that are not fully developed yet, a great deal of complications can occur if a child has a baby. This is one of the few cases where I think abortion should be encouraged. Sure, you'd be killing the baby, but if it is for the safety of the child carrying the baby....
2007-07-04 20:45:31 · answer #3 · answered by Erin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they're younger then twelve then what are they doing having sex to make babies? I don't think a lot of females can conceive at that age anyways
2007-07-04 19:02:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is wrong on so many levels, no twelve year old has any business having sex, mush less having a baby. If a twelve year old is raped of course it is not their fault, but if they are out having sex already then that is just ridiculous.
2007-07-03 19:50:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought you drew the line at 14. You're slipping, Sandy.
2007-07-03 19:14:39 · answer #6 · answered by kitten lover3 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
to start with at twelve they would still be kids not women, not even teenagers.
At that fragile age they should be attending school, enjoying their childhood & being cared for by loving parents.
It is child abuse having sex with underaged girls & impregnating them - its appouling
2007-07-03 20:13:03 · answer #7 · answered by Angel Girl 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Females under 12 are not women.
It is dangerous and often unsuccessful for women under 18 to have children.
While I really hope my kids don't have sex until they're 18, I would certainly advocate the use of birth control. Realistically, they're going to do it at some point. It's better to be protected from unwanted pregnancy and certainly unwanted STDs.
2007-07-03 16:44:13 · answer #8 · answered by Two Lips 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
In a world wide perspective: They carry them. None of your business.
2007-07-03 19:12:10 · answer #9 · answered by LuckyLilTroll2U 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I don't think it's very safe and that is too young. At that age you are still a child or think like one. To young
2007-07-03 16:47:23 · answer #10 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If they're younger than 12, they're not even women yet. Not a good idea at all.
2007-07-03 16:43:02 · answer #11 · answered by Ruthinia 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋