Of course. What other motivation could he possibly have to want to obstruct justice? The reason he wanted to mislead the investigation is clearly because there was something there to be hidden. Of course he's taking the rap for somebody else. He has no motive to do this for himself.
2007-07-03 08:05:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
It is kind of funny really, when you consider the clintons continue criminal enterprise.
There are some odors that just can't be washed away.
WASHINGTON -- Six years ago, the launch of Hillary Clinton's career in the US Senate was marred by allegations that her brothers had received payments from people pardoned by President Bill Clinton in the waning months of his presidency.
Now, in the wake of the launch of her presidential campaign, the pardon controversy has reemerged in an obscure court case in which Senator Clinton's brother Tony is battling an order to repay more than $100,000 he received from a couple pardoned by President Clinton.
Tony Rodham, who acknowledged approaching the president about a pardon for the couple, is the second of Hillary Clinton's brothers to receive money from people who were eventually pardoned by President Clinton. Hugh Rodham received $400,000 from two people, one of whom was pardoned and one whose sentence was commuted.
But while Hillary Clinton immediately expressed chagrin over the news in 2001 that Hugh received the money -- and asked him to return it -- she said Tony was "not paid," according to a congressional report. The Clinton campaign yesterday declined to comment on the case involving Tony Rodham.
Clinton critics have been seeking to revive an array of controversies, from the Whitewater land deal to the Monica Lewinsky case. The Clinton campaign has sought to depict them as old or moot cases. But the Tony Rodham case could be different because it is in court just as Senator Clinton's campaign reaches full speed.
Yesterday, US Bankruptcy Court Judge Marian Harrison of Nashville ordered Tony Rodham to respond by March 16 to the allegation that he failed to repay a loan of $107,000 from the couple pardoned by Clinton, according to attorneys involved in the case.
The Stench Of Democrat Hypocrisy
http://sigcarlfred.blogspot.com/
2007-07-03 19:37:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by rmagedon 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Absolutely. This is to keep him from singing. Bush refused to commute sentences in Texas from death to life for inmates that were clearly not guilty. This is just another miscarriage of justice by Bush. He'll let innocent black people die, but commute the sentence of guilty, rich, white men.
2007-07-03 15:11:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by prekinpdx 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Any time Hillary points a finger at someone while sitting atop her high horse, I can't help but laugh.
She's really got a pair, I'll give her that.
2007-07-03 15:09:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bumblebee711 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary is making a statement to earn votes, knowing full well the evidence of that is slim to nil, but that most people will take her word for it. She has no actual evidence, it is just a political game that all politicians play.
http://www.dryflypolitics.com
2007-07-03 15:09:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by sbay311 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
To me, it's obvious and when Libby eventually gets fully pardoned it should come as no suprise. It's just politics.
2007-07-03 15:07:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
Yes, it's pretty obvious he is another Bush/Cheney fall guy. Will they ever run out of them?
2007-07-03 15:07:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
just following the Republican platform
all is good which benefits us
2007-07-03 15:23:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Covering up what? That Richard Armitage gave Novak Plame's name, that everyone already knew?
2007-07-03 15:06:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by MEL T 7
·
1⤊
7⤋
YES - ISN'T IT OBVIOUS!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-07-03 15:06:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sassafrass 6
·
6⤊
1⤋