Paris had prior offenses, and broke the terms of her probation
Scooter had a perfectly clean record before this bogus witch hunt
2007-07-03 07:35:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
9⤋
Libby was convicted of perjury only. there is no evidence that he outed Plame. Plame had not been an active agent for at least 2 years. it has not been proved that she ever worked under cover. Paris Hilton's crime had the potential of being very serious, unless you condone driving drunk, but her crime was not greater. she was not sentenced to 2 1/2 years in prison either. your question is really a bunch of unrelated blabber.
2007-07-03 15:00:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Sorry for the tongue and cheek answer
Why was Paris Hilton's crime greater than Libby's?
No, but given the choice they preferred to strip search Paris
2007-07-03 15:00:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by crossingover 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Paris was putting people's lives at stake by driving drunk, while Libby didn't leak any information, and even the information he was questioned about that led to his perjury charges was not confidential.
2007-07-03 14:44:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bryan F 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
"Libby never leaked ANYTHING, he was convicted of telling a lie during the investigation of a crime that never happened"????
Does that make any logical sense whatsoever?
If the guy is that stupid to obstruct justice in an investigation of a crime that never happened, than he belongs in jail, for his own safety.
But it is funny how, if there was no crime, than how come he was trying to pass the buck back to georgie and dicky at the beginning??
Then all of a sudden he just shut up about it and road it out. would it be safe to say the pardon was already promised??
Libby did what he was told to do, to silence Wilson about the obvious fraudulent Nigerian papers.. If people don't see the problem with that, they are sick individuals.
2007-07-03 14:40:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
1⤊
4⤋
Libby was a scape-goat. The real thugs are his bosses. We can only hope that the next administration will release all pertinent data and send these criminals to jail.
2007-07-03 14:53:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by David M 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
1) Libby didn't leak anything. Do I think he got off easy? Definitely. But his crime did not warrant 2.5 years.
2) Paris broke the terms of her parole twice. Yes, she deserved a little time in jail.
2007-07-03 14:37:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by chlaxman17 4
·
6⤊
3⤋
Because she continued to flaunt her indiscretions. She did not follow her probation officers restrictions and got stopped twice driving in a unstable manner.
2007-07-03 15:18:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by elaeblue 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Even bush is smart enough to not pardon a lesser ape.
What use would it be for the Hilton's to "contribute" upwards to 20 million to Bush's campaign so Paris can get a pardon for a 30 day sentence? When she gets charged with vehicular manslaughter, then maybe we will see.
2007-07-03 14:41:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by BickBingBeck 2
·
1⤊
4⤋
We all know and some of us knew before Bush entered the white house he was a criminal .
He committed crimes in texas his brothers committed crimes the whole fan damily is full of criminals and ties to criminals .
Jeb is in bed with a cuban drug dealer and money launderer to such a great extent that a run for president is out of the question .
People all over florida know this and most just say well who is not involved .
Its a 80 billion dollar industry trading drugs and that means lots of people involved .
2007-07-03 14:39:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
were you one of those kids who tried to put the square peg into the round slot? because these 3 cases are totally unrelated to one another and have almost no common attributes whatsoever. try again.
2007-07-03 14:38:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by kujigafy 5
·
6⤊
0⤋