It was very obvious from the begining that he was'nt going to prison.
2007-07-03 03:35:07 · 10 answers · asked by Coach53 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Because go before can you go the American people and discuss being law abiding and allow a criminal to go free. I think Bush and Chaney should be impeached. This now shows that they were directly involved in the disclosing the identity of a CIA agent.
How can republicans go after Bill Clinton for lying that he had sex with Monica Lewinsky, and allow George Bush to get away with this.
2007-07-03 03:50:12 · answer #1 · answered by King Midas 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Libby wasn't pardoned, his sentence was commuted. SO he is on probation for 2 years and has to pay a 250 grand fine. And yes, this was inevitable.
Now maybe he will free the border patrol agents and the soldiers involved in the Hoax haditha massacre.
2007-07-03 03:39:53 · answer #2 · answered by Serpico7 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because this only proves one more time what a liar (or, to put it nicely, "a flip-flopper") bush is.
Just a few months back, he told America that he would see that whoever was responsible for this felony of leaking a CIA Undercover operative's identity would be found and punished "to the fullest extent of the law."
...and now, here he is commuting libby's sentence so the felonous criminal won't have to serve one day in jail where he belongs.
.
2007-07-03 03:41:22 · answer #3 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You're kidding, right? The only reason he did not go to prison was so that he would keep his mouth shut. He could do a lot of damage to Bush and his merry band of theives and liars.
Do youu think if Joe Average was convicted of the same or similar crime, that he would be pardoned? No.
It is just a further example of Bush and his dictator type practices that will bring this country down even further than it is.
I guess I could rant on and on about Bush, but, his actions speak so loud, that if you are listening, you are PISSED.
2007-07-03 03:40:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
1. Libby wasn't pardon.
2. Liberals think he was convicted of leaking Valeria's name to the press which isn't true either.
It was witch hunt and they got their pound of flessh.
2007-07-03 03:42:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He is a crook, but Bush followed his Constitutional rights to pardon Libby. He can pardon whoever he wishes.
2007-07-03 03:38:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Its like any other mole hill the libs can turn into a mountain...how quickly they forget how many "crooks and cronies" Clinton gave full pardons...selective memory is a liberals best friend.
2007-07-03 03:40:23 · answer #7 · answered by Lilliput1212 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The left wants to destroy anyone involved with this administration. They only care about their power and Bush's downfall.
2007-07-03 03:50:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
he was given that sentence because he performed a criminal act. bush commuting the sentence for one of his goons is unacceptable ( yes its constitutional). bush is sending the message that his administration is above the law.
2007-07-03 03:44:29 · answer #9 · answered by kah35 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Only the lefties are whining.
2007-07-03 03:42:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋