"Chappaquiddick!"
2007-07-03 03:32:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Scotty Doesnt Know 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
carry on, enable's be undemanding right here: The Civil Rights Act vote got here earlier the airplane crash. He ought to no longer have stood, on the Senate floor or everywhere else, for months in a while. He wasn't Superman, inspite of each and every thing. (If he grow to be, he would not have mandatory a airplane.) The national maximum cancers Act is the somewhat wonderful one, in case you think of roughly it: President Nixon asked Congress to bypass an initiative to conflict maximum cancers. once you communicate the contest between Nixon and the Kennedy brothers -- the two earlier and after this, because of the fact the 1974 marketing campaign finance regulation you point out provides information -- this grow to be a huge element, that those 2 adult adult males, each and every so frequently an ideologue, ought to place partisanship aside for the greater desirable stable. however the huge question is despite if he grow to be the final Senator of our time. observing each and every thing you indexed, I have not any concept who else ought to even come close. in the excellent twentieth Century, there are purely some contenders. Robert Wagner of manhattan (father of a later Mayor of NYC) wrote the Social protection Act that FDR asked for and the national hard paintings kin Act, 2 substantial products of law -- and that grow to be purely in one twelve months, 1935. yet by skill of the time of his 1979-80 run for President, Ted had already racked up sufficient achievements to surpass that. enable's settle for it, he grow to be plenty greater qualified for President than Jack grow to be on the time of his marketing campaign, and slightly greater desirable than Bobby on the time of his. and then he had almost yet another 30 years of accomplishments, to assert no longer something of the Senators he motivated, which comprise the present President, vp and Secretary of State.
2016-11-08 01:16:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by riveria 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's hard to say who exactly that would be. But Ted Kennedy would be a first-ballot entry into the Senate Hall of Fame, if there were such a thing.
And I should caution people about throwing reckelss charges of murder out there. It was clearly an ACCIDENT. (And NO, she was not his "mistress", either!) Nobody, not even Bush, would be so stupid as to try to kill someone by driving into the river together. Kennedy has a bad back since a 1962 plane crash and could barely save himself, let alone Kopechne.
Amazing how unfair and uncharitable "moral" Christians like you people are.
2007-07-03 03:37:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Ted, you've been warned about getting on this site when you start drinking. Please, it's only the third. Wait until tomorrow to start drinking even if your conscience is bothering you about Chappaquiddick. I know the anniversity has just passed. Not the anniversity of Mary Joe's death but the death you chances to be President.
2007-07-03 03:36:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No, but he IS a murderer. Just ask his girlfriend that drowned in the Chappquiddick (sp?). Oh that's right you can't, because she is dead.
2007-07-03 03:44:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
surely you jest this is the alcoholic whore monger that has been trading on the family name for decades--remember Chappaquidick?
2007-07-03 03:33:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Southern Comfort 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Well his dead mistress who he drove off a bridge would say NO!
2007-07-03 03:38:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by steelersfan2010 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not.
For one thing, he got away with murder or at least manslaughter.
2007-07-03 03:33:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Patsy A 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
The drunk killer loser milking a dynasty... gimme a break
2007-07-03 03:33:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Antiliber 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Not even close.
2007-07-03 03:34:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
What have you been smoking this morning?
2007-07-03 04:09:08
·
answer #11
·
answered by tigrompy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋