2007-07-03 01:49:22 · 7 answers · asked by curious 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Radio
cause radio was meant to be free
2007-07-03 04:39:12 · answer #1 · answered by dominiqueegarcia 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not everyone is getting rid of Xm Radio. XM Has more then 8 Million Subscibers and there doing fine. Sirius hasnt made 7 mil yet! I think the merger is scaring people as well as people just don't want to pay the price. Its not about whos better its about what they want in radio.
2007-07-03 10:53:09 · answer #2 · answered by The Cool Radio Man 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unless you’re a big Major League Baseball fan, Sirius Radio is more attractive across the board.
There’s also celebrity appeal in favor of Sirius from Howard Stern to Martha Stewart. Yeah, XM has Oprah, but she’s only on live, what — a half-hour each week?
Sirius is a better product — but it may all be moot if Congress allows them to merge into one company.
After listening to satellite radio for a few years, it’s a real chore to try to listen to all the commercial-filled terrestrial radio.
2007-07-03 09:00:54 · answer #3 · answered by Noah’s Dad 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I owe Sirius and it's so much better than XM.
2007-07-03 10:36:33 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
because it was a repi off. who pays to listen to radio, when you can listen for free.
2007-07-03 09:00:48 · answer #5 · answered by Michael M 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think it was a passing fad.
2007-07-03 08:54:46 · answer #6 · answered by Snowflake 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
becuase they should have bought serius
2007-07-03 08:52:19 · answer #7 · answered by jd 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋