"Origin" or "End " which comes first? Please put your comments.?

Question

In wherever civilization can it be better answered which comes,
"origin" or "ends"

I suggest as a logical basis, Ends of something open the chance for a new origin . So it is interpreted interchangebly with origin itself as the end vice versa

Answer 1

Yes. At the exact moment something ends, it becomes something deferrent. A new beginning in a different form. So in this sense the two are interchangable, just different persectives. We can say the end of communism or the coming of democracy to describe one event. Which came first? It could be argued that in this case the end of communism was first, but in truth they both happened at the same time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality
This idea plays a big role in many philosophical works, science theory's and in some religions, under many different names, but causality and interrelatedness are two names which encompass this idea.

Answer 2

Well, this is a very odd question and I'm not sure if I am clear about what you're asking, but here goes...
You can't have an ending without first having a beginning or origin, but you can have a beginning and no end, it's called infinity. So origin comes first.

Answer 3

The origin of something is its source, so it's a stretch for me to have it following an end. Origin doesn't really mean the same as beginning. I'd say origin has to come first.

Answer 4

orgin is a source i think you have the worng word