The procedure won't kill you. Polyps that become malignant will kill you.
Each year, more than 50,000 people die from colorectal cancer.
Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of death due to cancer for men and women combined. (Lung cancer is the first.)
Someone dies from colorectal cancer every 9.3 minutes.
More lives are lost each year to colorectal cancer than to breast cancer and AIDS combined.
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common, and yet preventable, cancers.
2007-07-02 19:13:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Charlie P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Colonoscopy is done better all the time. They give you medications that keep you comfortable and you don't remember the procedure. Just have someone with you to write out notes for you of what the doctor finds. The doctor generally would remove polyps while the scope is in there. It's made to remove the polyps and cauterize the spot to stop bleeding. My husband just had this done a few months ago and other than the laxative procedure before hand, the colonoscopy wasn't nearly as bad as he had imagined.
It is wonderful that you can know what's going on in their if you have symptoms or a family history of colon trouble. I will be going in soon. Better safe than sorry!
2007-07-02 19:13:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Susan M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Like all cancers, colon cancer is best prevented or treated in its earliest stage. Colonoscopy is still the "Gold Standard" for early detection of colon cancer, or better yet, pre-cancerous polyps. And yes, you should let the doctor remove any polyps he finds. Some of these become cancerous over the years.
Colonoscopy is more sensitive than a barium enema in detecting small polyps.
A camera pill is being studied. You swallow a pill containing a miniature camera that takes many pictures as it traverses the digestive tract. I think this is still in the research stage as to its effectiveness. And, if you have a polyp, you have to undergo the prep all over again to have it removed.
2007-07-02 19:12:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by greydoc6 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
A colonoscopy is a way to get a look at your colon and try to catch abnormal growths like polyps before they become cancerous. The polyps are localized so removing them now will hopefully prevent them from spreading. I have helped resect colons of people with cancer who ended up having special bags for thier fecal material. I would rather have a camera stuck up my bottom every so often if there is a chance of preventing me from having a resected colon needing a bag. Also you usually need to decided before you go in if you want polyps removed because you will be sedated during the procedure. If they don't remove them when they are up there, then they will have to go up at a later date and remove them.
2007-07-02 19:09:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Stephanie H 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i substitute right into a healthy 44yr previous. in no way one to pass to the docs till I had to get a cut back stitched up, tetanus injections, or have slightly one. the only reason I went to the docs this time substitute into to get a mandatory wellness clearance to start a job. After telling him a pair of couple of somewhat basic run of the mill court docket circumstances that I had (no longer constipation) he booked me in for a colonoscopy. Thank goodness because of the fact they chanced on that I had a small tumour becoming in my decrease colon. Catching it this early meant that i substitute into cured by surgical treatment on my own. No Chemo No Radiation therapy. Get the colonoscopy finished. It does not harm, this is in basic terms uncomfortable. in case you do no longer want it finished because of the fact this is embarrassing, properly, you in basic terms isn't the 1st to " Die of Embarrassment".
2016-10-03 11:28:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by clarice 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
For persons of a certain age (the 50's) colonoscopy has been shown to be a cost-effective way of screening for colorectal cancer. Here's a url:
http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspscolo.htm
2007-07-02 19:37:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say,only if it (colon cancer) runs in your family,go ahead and get a screening.But,if you feel you need a peace of mind also,yes.And if they do find pollyps,i would definitely let them be removed.There is a mineral called Rutin,it is good for bowel skin.You can buy it at any store that sales vitamins.
2007-07-02 19:06:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes you should definitely have the procedure and yes they remove the pallops to test for cancer. It could save your life!!
2007-07-02 19:07:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by soso 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
its always good to take a look at other options, but if you've got polyps, they can turn malignant and cause parts of your colon to have to be removed, so in my opinion, they should be taken out. good luck!
2007-07-02 19:04:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by froggyRN 2
·
0⤊
0⤋