i think so too. were in debt, thousands have died in iraq, and quite frankly he is an uneducated dumbass that says nucular. i liked clinton even tho he was a cheater.
2007-07-02 18:00:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Each and every one of your points has a clear positive note to it. Or at the vary least, has change little sinse the Reagan administration. C'mon, job loss ? Lowest and most continuous unemployment trend (currently 4.7%) since 1982 where it approached 10%. Hardly major. You have fallen into the thick media fog. Don't be a mere sheep, follow along blindly, and contribute to the misrepresentation. You have a personal responsibility to look into this yourself and clear away the mist and shed light on the actual truth of things. If you think the media is not biased against everything Bush, your mistaken.
2016-05-17 05:41:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lest us not forget that there is still 24 percent of the population that is hanging on to the dream (nightmare?) that there is some sense in what this man has done. He is not only the worst president this country has ever seen, he is one of the worst leaders that this world has ever seen.
Never has a leader started his reign with so much and left his reign in such a significantly depleted situation.
The man is a fool that has surrounded himself with delusional hawks and the country will be paying the price for years to come.
And the con wacko's are all out on YA rewinding the rhetoric that they listened to on FOX earlier in the day. Part of that 24% (and shrinking) population
2007-07-02 18:52:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by mark 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why?For the same reasons as your's is the worst question in this forum.For any meaning full debate to evolve,do not mix up emotions with factual ground conditions. It will take political historians some years to realize and accept the long lasting outcome of the the policies and actions of Mr,Bush.For a starter,America is a much safer place today than before and any miscreant would think twice before embarking on any misadventure on American soil.As to the fact that some Americans have the habit of disregarding and demeaning their Presidents[who so ever he may be] ,I have nothing to comment except being in a bad taste.I am not an American but have high regards for the most successful functional Democracy in the world and it's wonderful people,who have made it work.As such,America has an Historical responsibility and also a moral obligation to wards establishment of democracy in this world,where it is needed urgently.
2007-07-02 18:54:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by brkshandilya 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
Good grief! President Bush is doing as good as possible under very trying circumstances.I shudder to think what would have happened if the liberals had made it into the whitehouse.The only real idiots are the panty waist Democrats that want to cut and run.If we don't have the intestinal fortitude to finish this job,we will only strengthen the terrorists.Would you rather fight them here or over there??
2007-07-02 21:25:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
just because u will never be president does not mean u have to be ignorant,i am sure if u were faced with the responsibility u would buckle to your knees,even if he was voted worst president or not who cares they still voted for him to be the president,as a president u have certain privileges u do what ever u have to do to save the country and ignore the handful idiots who does not agree with u.i for one think he should have resigned and left u idiots right after spt 11 but i am glad he did not because your country would have been in hell,no matter how much we all want peace u have to attack your enemies before they destroy u weather the people like it or not.its just like protecting a child from things that they don't know that can hurt them thats what he is doing.u hated your parents when they tried to protect u and so u will obviously hate him too.
2007-07-02 18:16:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rendevous 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
We couldhave had worst, and we still could. Alot happened when he became president that was beyond his control too. I don't agree with all that he's done, don't get me wrong, he made alot of f uck ups, but I couldn't have done better either.
Give the man some credit, he didn't ask for all of this to unravel when he was voted in, he's had more fall onto his plate that most presidents ever experienced.
2007-07-02 18:00:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Wutz it worth 2 ya? 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
He isnt the worst president ever, William Taft is known throughout history as that. Becarefull what you wish for things could get worse. Keep in mind the debt was inherited from the clinton administration its wasnt all Bush's fault.
2007-07-02 18:02:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by firetdriver_99 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - NANCY PELOSI 1998
If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity, even in the face of a clear message from the United Nations Security Council and clear evidence of a weapons of mass destruction program." - BILL CLINTON 1998
"We stopped the fighting [in 1991] on an agreement that Iraq would take steps to assure the world that it would not engage in further aggression and that it would destroy its weapons of mass destruction. It has refused to take those steps. That refusal constitutes a breach of the armistice which renders it void and justifies resumption of the armed conflict." - HARRY REID 2002
"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." - EDWARD KENNEDY
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members... - HILLARY CLINTON 2002
One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.
Bush's made up WMD's? Beside, Scooter Libby's punishment was to stern for someone who was charged for perjury? And how much time in prison did Clinton do for his perjury? Thats right hypocrit NONE!
2007-07-02 18:18:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
hes not the worst mannad hes not as dumb as we think he went to yale but hes just a mouth piece the goverment so f****
up that no one nos whos runnin the joint
2007-07-02 18:06:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋