English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-07-02 17:36:22 · 10 answers · asked by chapatti12 2 in Sports Wrestling

10 answers

Neither, I suppose. They are both dead. I suppose Eddie is more decomposed than Benoit. Both abused steroids and both died - Eddie from years of use. They still don't have the results for Benoit, but his doctor prescribed him a 10 month supply of steroids every 3-4 WEEKS, from May 2006 through May 9, 2007, according to prosecutors, so if he passed the drug test like WWE said he did, someone paid those people to keep the real results quiet or WWE just out and lied about the whole thing.

2007-07-02 18:03:11 · answer #1 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 0 1

Eddie was a good wrestler but Benoit was better in that benoit was one of the best techinical wrestlers of our time

Rip To Both Eddie Gurrerro and Chris Benoit

Miss You Both

I hope they find the animal or animals that did this to benoit and his family

I belive this was a hit made to look like a murder suicide
THere are just 2 many things that don't add up

And that's looking at it from both sides and playing devils advocate at times

Prayers Go out to your parents and your remaining 2 children

2007-07-02 18:53:46 · answer #2 · answered by rebel_angel031 3 · 0 1

I cherished Eddie Guerrero greater effective. Eddie Guerrero substitute into lots greater relaxing and a greater robust champion. while Chris Benoit substitute into the international Heavyweight champion, he have been given uninteresting after a mutually as. yet while Eddie Guerrero substitute into the WWE Champion, he substitute into relaxing. Eddie's terrific fued had to be with JBL. That fued substitute into astonishing. there substitute into lots in the back of it, Their tournament at Judgement Day 2004 substitute right into a classic. Eddie substitute into lots greater relaxing that Chris Benoit substitute into, Chris Benoit's suits generally bored me, yet I do think of that he substitute into an notion to the greater youthful expertise of the WWE. yet Eddie Guerrero substitute into additionally an notion to the greater youthful expertise of the WWE. 2004 and 2005 have been in all probability Eddie Guerrero's terrific years.

2016-10-03 11:22:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

umm, i think you mean "who WAS better". anyway, both were tremendous wrestlers/entertainers. benoit was more technical and eddie was more of a high flyer (even if benoit had the suicide (ironic) dive and the flying headbutt)

2007-07-02 19:42:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

benoit is better, but eddie is good.

2007-07-02 18:24:30 · answer #5 · answered by bootis32 6 · 0 0

Both

2007-07-02 18:37:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

eddie because he didn't go psycho and kill half his freaking family...I have no respect for benoit...NO EXCUSE for what he did!!!

2007-07-02 18:04:36 · answer #7 · answered by Veronica 2 · 0 1

they both sucked, to me they were 3 of the worthless superstars there + super crazy + carlito+ umaga+ rey mystersumthin like that+and lindsay aka lashley!

2007-07-02 18:40:58 · answer #8 · answered by tarek k 1 · 0 0

Neither, they're both dead.

Sorry, couldn't resist. Now if you had ask who "was" better, you'd have gotten a TOTALLY different response.

2007-07-02 18:03:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Owen is rolling over in his grave.

2007-07-02 18:33:01 · answer #10 · answered by bosox08 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers